CChambers84
Scout Team
- Joined
- May 22, 2004
- Messages
- 995
- Reaction score
- 10
Looks like Luck is the NFLs new golden boy..what a shame, we could of had him..
I know it's not all about the numbers , but from what I see and keep in mind I wanted us to get Luck. He is playing average and any Qb could have broke the rookie record against Miami's soft coverage. We knew he would pass and we play off all day , gimme a break. I'm looking at him play ,not the hype and he lobs the ball up for grabs alot. It's obvious to me that there's a push by the suits for him to win rook of the year. Maybe u think he's the greatest qb ever , but To me he's getting the benefit of doubt and alot of help tonight from the refs.The fact that you are quoting his stats as your #1 reason for saying he needs to show you more says more about your QB evaluating ability rather than Luck's ability as a QB. If you didn't see that was a special QB on the field on Sunday . . . hell I can't help you. Use your eyes and not numbers and realize that Luck put that team on his back and won that game for the Colts on Sunday.
Wats up kdawg he doesn't lobb it?
My analysis is just fine thank u.
9 INTs in 9 games.. on pace for 16... How is that "INT machine"? Peyton averaged 1 INT a game in 09 and '10.. was he an INT machine too?He has been an int machine so far . Not saying he can't get better . You crown him if you want .
Or we can stop dwelling on things and even if we beat them we still would've been rooting for the jags