darkmistress
d'Artiste
The only REAL difference between having and not having Williams in the back field is that without him we got better value in the draft after missing the playoffs. :D
Good point.darkmistress said:The only REAL difference between having and not having Williams in the back field is that without him we got better value in the draft after missing the playoffs. :D
thats why i gave conditions for my quote.... i said if he gained some weight and stayed off the green..NYFINNER said:The THREAT will not be the same, he's 30lbs lighter and a hippy now too! Just walk away!:tongue:
texasPHINSfan said:its not THAT easy to replace a 1300 yard back.... if its so easy, what happened last year? you honestly think whatever rookie we draft is going to hit that yardage on his first year in this league? with our o-line?
bottom line is, even if ricky doesn't give us 1800 or 1300 yards again, he gives us a threat - something opposing D's will have to respect... and sometimes thats bigger than yardage. (i.e. help feeley in the pocket).
considering it wouldn't cost us ANYthing to get him back, can you explain to me how the risks outweigh the rewards?csabe said:I agree with your point about having a threat but with his quirky personality, team distractions, among countless other things including his not being the same Ricky we all saw or not even trying to be. The risk outweighs the reward, bottom line.
:roflmao: :roflmao:Noodle Arm said:You know IF Ricky comes back...we can always do something to keep him motivated...
:D