The problem does not lie with me. It lies with you. You have no understanding what it takes to develop a QB. You think you can plug a future franchise QB from college into the NFL and he will have great games from the get-go.
2 years is a normal developmen period for a young QB sometimes it may even take 3 years. In a perfect world you would sit a QB for the first year or at least a portion of the first year.
If I go by your philosophy QBs like Aikman would have never made it in the NFL.
Oh, look! A straw man argument!
I never expected to plug in a college QB and he will have great games from the get go. What I expect is that he'll maybe hit 3 TDs in a game more than than once a season. Maybe, by the grace of God, he breaks 300 yards in a game. Maybe... he doesn't hold the ball so long that I could take a nap in-between plays. Maybe... he won't struggle to hit double digit yards in the second half of games when it's still close.
As for Aikman, yeah, sure, let's bring up a comparison from 1989. The rules are DEFINITELY the same and it's DEFINITELY not easier for a quarterback to jump right into the NFL these days. You're talking about an era where 24 TDs his senior year gets him drafted number one overall because college offenses and QBs back then had no idea wtf they were doing, so of course the transition to the NFL is going to be steep. We're in an age now where college coaches are going to the pros and vice versa because the $$$ is there in college to make it worth it so these guys are getting legitimate coaching and running legitimate offenses. Hell, Tannehill walked straight into the NFL with his college coach running the same offense and it didn't mean jack sh*t.
Regardless where Tua will end up you will be utterless surprised at the crap performances he will deliver when he begins his NFL career.
"Utterly"?
I also never said that we need an x-amount of probowlers to judge a QB. And I am sure neither our coaching staff or Rosen think that way. You can evaluate a QB on a ****ty team just as well. Maybe the stats do not say what you want to hear but there is a lot to learn of a QB playing under adversary and/or duress.
As a matter of fact I said that Rosen lost the starting gig in preseason on his best play in preseason.
The problem is really not on my side. It lies with you. You go by stat (I repeat the quote from Belichick: stats are for losers) only. That is your immovable measurement for you. But of you talk to a coach and how to evaluate a young QB they'll laugh you out of the room.
Hi, God complex guy. Guess what? You're not a coach either, even though you may pretend to be one on this forum. So since I'm not going over tape at night looking at every throw 100 times, guess what I go by? Oh! Stats! Sure, Belichick can say stats are for losers because he's above them and I've got news for you, dudeski... you're not.
The fact that you are so caught up in the word "cult" shows how insecure you are. The word Tua Cult was not my invention. I just adopted it. It came from your side. Some guy with a man crush like you have posted a while ago: I am part of the Tua Cult now (I am paraphrasing) sometimes in offseason.
You may want to find him and talk to him just as you want to find the guy from your "cult" who a few days ago answered the question as to how long he would give Tua to develop with: "3 years".
You're getting hung up on the wording itself so you clearly missed the point there. It has nothing to do with the wording. It's how you use it to denigrate a group of people who have a differing opinion than yours.
And yes, my approach is way better than yours. I am hoping that Rosen develops. If he doesn't we draft a QB. What a brilliant concept.
I am even going so far and be arrogant and dismissive to say that you do not know jack how to evaluate a QB. As far as I am concerned you can't evaluate a dam thing because on FH you have no track record of any kind of evaluation. The majority of your posts came this offseason. Unless you want to tell us what your other username is you have zero credibility. Zip. Nada. The only thing you are known for: Tua God. Dolphins suck. I root for the Dolphins to lose.
That is the summary of your FH life here.
"And yes, my approach is way better than yours"... Oh look, God complex example #2.
See, here's the funny thing. Not only do you say that I have no idea how to evaluate a QB and your "approach" is "better than mine"... YOU DON'T HAVE AN APPROACH. Do you really think that's going to go unnoticed? Your "approach" and "evaluation" is... "Let's wait and see what the coaches think at the end of the year". You must be super fun at parties. I mean, this is why the forums exist, so not only are you against giving an opinion or evaluation, but you hilariously talk to down people who actually ARE giving their opinions and evaluations. You're the equivalent of a football politician.
Now, you have a wonderful day.
