bdmagnum
Big Daddy
I asked this before in a previous thread, but never really got an answer. I know a lot of people are excited at the possibilty of getting Smith at #2, thinking SF takes Rodgers at #1.
But lately, I have been reading Rodgers stock is falling, Rodgers is a possible bust, Smith is much better than Rodgers, etc. If a majority of people sees that Smith is better than Rodgers, wouldn't it make sense for SF to take Smith first? If so, who do the Dolphins take at #2?
But lately, I have been reading Rodgers stock is falling, Rodgers is a possible bust, Smith is much better than Rodgers, etc. If a majority of people sees that Smith is better than Rodgers, wouldn't it make sense for SF to take Smith first? If so, who do the Dolphins take at #2?