Yeah, I’m not crazy about that either For Sewell. He’s lost a year of development. Might not matter in the scheme of things, but in particular with Chase and Smith, there are two prospects where it would have been nice to have seen film on both this year to compare. Also, a year off, will make their rookie year development slower potentially. Maybe not, but if your choosing two prospects and one has played and the other hasn’t and they are both blue chip prospects I’d lean towards the one who had played his final season vs the one who sat out. Obviously, there are other factors. I’m not concerned with Smith’s size, others might be.