I think our running back room is set and the team would be best served by focusing its coaching resources on integrating Achane‘s speed into the offense along with Mostert. Reek said something interesting the other day, he said imagine him and waddle on one side and Mostert. & Achane on the other, who do you cover? Or you could do it out of the backfield with regards to running routes. Does Cook have the speed that our offense covets? We have 3 very solid running backs, two of them are among the fastest players in the league, what do we need another running back that isn’t as fast as the two we have for? I can see if we didn’t draft Achane, but we did, and we drafted him with the intention of playing him and using his speed, not to sit him on the bench. So, I don’t get why people are still going on about Dalvin Cook, it doesn’t make any sense at this point. Or am I missing something?There seems to be a view by some that the Cook question is a simple yes or no, and that anyone who is not unconditionally on board is "anti-Cook".
I disagree. I think it is a cost/benefit question, moreso than anything.
I would like to see what my brother Phin fans think is an appropriate contract offer.
We can't possibly account for all variables, but I will attempt a range of possibilities.