who could be a starter in 2 years after leinard cutler and young

[fastball83]

If leinard , cutler and young are gone and quinn don't declare, who could be a starter QB in 2 years from now ? :confused:


happy christmas for everydolfans around the world

 

[Jaj]

I like Brodie Croyle, Bruce Gradkowski, Josh Betts and Drew Olson from all of the others available. Why you may ask? Accuracy simply said...

Croyle is probably the best option because he has 1st round talent if he stayed healthy, can move around a bit, has a nice deep ball, and is accurate. He also has great ability and intangibles. Frankly he's the perfect QB to develop because of the fact that he can hit the deep ball.

 

[Maynard the Hammer]

honest question about croyle:

im not a college fan, but the alabama games i have seen, the offense does nothing

how is croyle so good if his offense doesnt do much?

 

[Jaj]

honest question about croyle:

im not a college fan, but the alabama games i have seen, the offense does nothing

how is croyle so good if his offense doesnt do much?

The supporting cast sucks *** entirely...
-His OL just cannot block well for him.
-He's had some unfortunate injuries that have delayed his development.
-He lost his big time WR back in early October.

It's not like he's had a very bad year or anything. A college 130 rating is pretty efficient.

 

[Maynard the Hammer]

The supporting cast sucks *** entirely...
-His OL just cannot block well for him.
-He's had some unfortunate injuries that have delayed his development.
-He lost his big time WR back in early October.

It's not like he's had a very bad year or anything. A college 130 rating is pretty efficient.

good info. i have been wondering why the hell the team scores only 10 points if this guy is so good? that clears it up a bit :)

 

[Boik14]

honest question about croyle:

im not a college fan, but the alabama games i have seen, the offense does nothing

how is croyle so good if his offense doesnt do much?

He plays in a very conservative offense for one. The supporting cast is also raw on offense.

The one thing Croyle has to do is get stronger. He's got a great arm and solid accuracy. He can take a hit but seems susceptible to careless freak injuries. But he was viewed as an elite talent before he hurt himself. I havent seen that talent disappear. Far from. His record over the last 2 seasons is quite telling; Bama is something like 13-2 with him starting. They certainly missed him last year as they went winless without him.

Croyle or Olsen somewhere in rd 3 or 4 are my choices. I like Cutler too but no way would I take him in the mid 1st. Thats laughable IMO. Cutler simply doesnt carry that kind of grade.

 

[FinaticPatch]

Olsen for UCLA......yes the pac-10 is weak but his accuracy is amazing.

 

[Winbaby#23]

Another thing about Croyle is that he only weighs 200 lbs. There is noway i mean noway he can hits in the NFL at that weight consistently.

 

[Danny]

I like Brodie Croyle, Bruce Gradkowski, Josh Betts and Drew Olson from all of the others available. Why you may ask? Accuracy simply said...

Croyle is probably the best option because he has 1st round talent if he stayed healthy, can move around a bit, has a nice deep ball, and is accurate. He also has great ability and intangibles. Frankly he's the perfect QB to develop because of the fact that he can hit the deep ball.

I'm really starting to think that we'll get our QB in the 3rd round or lower.I like Olsen and I think Betts could surprise some people...he's got a good arm and needs work but he could be the pick at some point.I have seen a mock that has Croyle to us in the 3rd round...I also like Pinnegar but some people don't think he fits our offence.

Ozzy rules!!

:rockon: :guitar:

 

[Jaj]

Another thing about Croyle is that he only weighs 200 lbs. There is noway i mean noway he can hits in the NFL at that weight consistently.

Well if that's his biggest problem than bring him on. Brady gotten much heavier ever since he came into the NFL.