I would guess we missed out on Zach Allen at 64, because he is a DL/DE guy that fits our scheme and fills a need we failed to fill, edge rusher. If not him, I would think it would be all the way down to 77 and Chase Winovich, who is the better version of Andrew Van Ginkel, who also fits out scheme and would fill that edge rushing scheme. Unfortunately, the drop off from Winovich to van Ginkel is pretty substantial. Then in Van Ginkel's spot we would have most likely drafted another starting OL. Many on this board are fans of always taking shots at QB's … well that's what we did, so let's hope it works out. The reality is that when you choose you make two choices, the one you get, and the choice not to get the next best alternative … in this case it would have been a defensive starter who is an upgrade over Van Ginkel, and then probably a starting OL with the Van Ginkel pick.