Who had the bigger collapse? | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Who had the bigger collapse?

MarksBrothers85

Practice Squad
Joined
Jan 14, 2003
Messages
601
Reaction score
0
Age
39
I know this is a tad old hat but, who do you think had the bigger collapse? The Vikings in the 2003 finale at Arizona or the Dolphins in the 2002 finale at New England?
 
Vikings. At least we lost to the defending super bowl champions. They lost to a team with three wins and a back-up quarterback.
 
Originally posted by Fin4life
Vikings. At least we lost to the defending super bowl champions. They lost to a team with three wins and a back-up quarterback.
:up:
 
LOL, the Vikings got beat by Josh McCown & Nate Poole. Terrible.
 
Vikes definitely... if the field goal is good, then they go to the super bowl and probably win. We had much less at stake and just had inopportune things happen
 
Gotta take the Vikes. What did they have, an 18 point lead with 5 minutes left?

And thanks for mentioning that season finale against the Pats. I had just blocked that out of my mind. :fire:
 
:topic: 1993 Phins from 9-2 to 9-7 :(
 
For the Viks to lose to the lowly Cards and to have the game knock you out of the playoffs is so much worse!!!
 
Back
Top Bottom