Who's your favorate pick at 6
- Thread starter clutch
- Start date
FINOMINAL
Scout Team
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2007
- Messages
- 2,153
- Reaction score
- 1,262
I just see Pitts getting better and better just as Tua will do, and to see them together for a few years becoming like a Brady/Gronk pair is just too much bang for your buck here. Thanks Houston. I'll take that over a speedy wide receiver that may be a flash in the pan or slowing down right when we need him most. Pitts just gets better.
I’m ok with a trade down if Pitts and Chase are gone.....
Even better as Gronk doesn’t have the receiver abilities of Pitts...
I voted for Pitts, although Sewell’s been my target since Last year. Right now I think that potential dynamic on offense is too much to pass on.
My top 7 board is Pitts, Sewell, Chase, Smith, Waddle, Parsons, Slater, in that orde
Chase or Smith I’d look to draft at 8 or 9.
I’m really trying to grab two players off that board with 6 and 18, without moving 36 or 50.
If we land Pitts at 6, Mike Gesicki becomes a tradable chip. Not that I want to get rid of him but if I can use him to move up easier for Sewell, Chase, Smith or Waddle to go with Pitts, I’m frantically trying to make it happen.
My top 7 board is Pitts, Sewell, Chase, Smith, Waddle, Parsons, Slater, in that orde
Chase or Smith I’d look to draft at 8 or 9.
I’m really trying to grab two players off that board with 6 and 18, without moving 36 or 50.
If we land Pitts at 6, Mike Gesicki becomes a tradable chip. Not that I want to get rid of him but if I can use him to move up easier for Sewell, Chase, Smith or Waddle to go with Pitts, I’m frantically trying to make it happen.
Ray R
Club Member
That can't be right your posts looks so much younger.
True, my maturity was arrested around the third grade.
Bad as that is, it is not as bad as being a millennial. Those kids are the "Pitts". Hum, may explain some of the draft posts I've been curious about - LOL
