Why FA Will Cost More In 2015 and 2016 | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Why FA Will Cost More In 2015 and 2016

So Be

Active Roster
Joined
Jul 2, 2006
Messages
16,572
Reaction score
2,216
The 2011 collective bargaining agreement says teams must spend 89% of the salary cap in cash over two distinct four-year periods (2013-16 and 2017-20).
According to numbers compiled last week by the NFL Players Association, nearly one-third of the league's clubs are below the minimum cash spending floor for the four-year window from 2013 to '16, and those teams will have to make up the difference at a time the salary cap is rising.
Over the past two seasons, the Raiders spent the least cash: about $205.3 million, or 80.2% of the $256 million total they were allotted, per the NFLPA. If the cap goes up by $10 million per year in both 2015 and '16, the Raiders' average payroll for the next two seasons must increase by more than $40 million just to hit the minimum.
Agents figure to take notice of which teams have to spend money as they prepare for the annual slew of pre-free agency meetings this week at the NFL scouting combine in Indianapolis.

Q
Five players who should get NFL franchise tag, and five who shouldn't




Also underspending — as of Feb. 9, when the NFLPA calculated the numbers — were: the Carolina Panthers (80.8%), New York Jets (81.16%), Jacksonville Jaguars (82.2%), Dallas Cowboys (82.6%), New England (82.7%), New Orleans Saints (86.2%), Washington Redskins (87%), New York Giants (87.9%) and Pittsburgh Steelers (88.3%).
Top spenders for the 2013 and '14 league years were: the Green Bay Packers ($296.9 million, 116% of the cap), Atlanta Falcons ($279.3 million, 109.1%), Seattle Seahawks ($274.9 million, 107.4%), Chicago Bears ($271.5 million, 106%) and Denver Broncos ($269.8 million, 105.4%).

From USA Today

What this very simply is that there are a lot of teams who MUST spend a lot of money this year, and the cost of FA will at an all time high. Hickey must overspend or be left out on top talent and likely middle talent.
 
I understand your thread bro however there comes a time in a players career that money may not be the sole decision in making a choice as winning a super bowl becomes a just important priority in selecting a team.
 
Sit out of players are deemed over valued
 
There are still going to be players of value available
 
One more thing. A signing bonus counts in total when it is paid, and not pro-rated. Future payments in salary and bonuses after 2016 do not count. I expect to see many very big signing bonuses, which is guaranteed money. That's going to be difficult for us to compete with to add a number of players.
 
I understand your thread bro however there comes a time in a players career that money may not be the sole decision in making a choice as winning a super bowl becomes a just important priority in selecting a team.

Those players are few, and would have little reason to come to Miami.
 
I think that more teams will give their money away to sign their own.
 
I think that more teams will give their money away to sign their own.

Likely true if they have the players worth keeping. However, that has pretty much the same effect as the FA market is diminished, and players available will get more. Take a look at a recent example in SD's King Dunlap, a bit above average LT. He got $7M a year, and is no longer a FA.

How does that affect what Pouncey or any FA on the OL will now want although he is a LT? Contract speculation based on last year is pretty much out the window. The price of poker has gone up.
 
Those players are few, and would have little reason to come to Miami.

I think if we had a different head coach that would be a different story sir.

I might be peering over the fence, but I'm staying in Philbin's backyard for the time being.

Though, the reason why the grass might be greener here is because all the **** to fertilize it. :chuckle:
 
Back
Top Bottom