Why not Aaron Rodgers? | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Why not Aaron Rodgers?

Aqua Man

Scout Team
Club Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2004
Messages
935
Reaction score
4,623
Now that we’ve survived the Watson fiasco (for now), if Tua fails to impress the rest of the season, why not make a run at A-Rod? There’s a ton of reasons to scoff at this, but hear me out. I think I can address all the reasons why it wouldn’t happen:

- ARod doesn’t cost us any draft capital. He’s almost certainly walking away from GB this offseason and still has 3-4 years of high quality football ahead of him IMO.

- Miami can terminate Flores and Grier at the end of the season and tell Arod that he can hand pick his next GM, HC and OC. He’s been frustrated in GB because they never seek his input. In Miami he could finish out his HOF career on his terms with coaches he wants to play for.

- We could be aggressive and bring Devante Adams with him. I’m sure GB will franchise Adams, but Miami could either negotiate with the Packers on compensation and try and to acquire him for something along the lines of a 1st and a 3rd, but even if Miami just bit the bullet and gave up the two #1’s required to sign a tagged player, wouldn’t it be worth it if it netted us Arod AND Adams? There’s ZERO percent chance we’d net 2 players of that quality by keeping the picks.

- Miami commits to resigning Gesecki, along with hitting the FA market hard for quality O-lineman. It wouldn’t be too hard to imagine most of the decent lineman on the market saying yes to a Miami team that had just added Rodgers and Adams.

- The Defense has enough talent that a new coaching staff should have no problems fielding a competitive unit on that side of the ball. On Offense, a unit that has an improved O-line, Arod at QB, and a nucleus of pass catchers that starts with Adams, Waddle, and Gesecki could be a very impressive group.

While Rodgers isn’t as long of a term answer compared to Watson, I think going this route gives us a few advantages if Miami still decides to move on from Tua after the season: We’ll have a top 5 QB that’s not facing future disciplinary action, including what’s bound to be a lengthy suspension, if spending 2 draft picks on Adams lures Rodgers to Miami, we’ve officially acquired 2 players in the top 5 of their positions for LESS draft capital than it would cost us just to trade for Watson in the offseason, Adams still has a lot of tread on the tires so it’s likely that he’s still catching TD’s for Miami after Rodgers retires, and if we hire a competent GM to replace Grier, Miami would be able to identify/start grooming a young QB to take over after Rodgers retires.

To me, this scenario is SO MUCH more intelligent than continuing down the rabbit hole pursuing Watson in the offseason. In fact, it makes so much sense, I can’t fathom that Ross would be smart enough to make it happen. 🤷🏼‍♂️
 
Aaron Rodgers age alone dictates that he goes to a "win now" team. We are no where near being a "win now" team. The Patriots, Saints and maybe some others could benefit, not us.
I see what you mean, but how many win now teams are just a QB away? Tampa Bay was a pretty unique situation. Considering the potential money we have for free agency we might be in about as good a position as any.

But yah, if a team like the Browns we’re willing to move on from Baker for ARod or something like that he probably chooses them.
 
Now that we’ve survived the Watson fiasco (for now), if Tua fails to impress the rest of the season, why not make a run at A-Rod? There’s a ton of reasons to scoff at this, but hear me out. I think I can address all the reasons why it wouldn’t happen:

- ARod doesn’t cost us any draft capital. He’s almost certainly walking away from GB this offseason and still has 3-4 years of high quality football ahead of him IMO.

- Miami can terminate Flores and Grier at the end of the season and tell Arod that he can hand pick his next GM, HC and OC. He’s been frustrated in GB because they never seek his input. In Miami he could finish out his HOF career on his terms with coaches he wants to play for.

- We could be aggressive and bring Devante Adams with him. I’m sure GB will franchise Adams, but Miami could either negotiate with the Packers on compensation and try and to acquire him for something along the lines of a 1st and a 3rd, but even if Miami just bit the bullet and gave up the two #1’s required to sign a tagged player, wouldn’t it be worth it if it netted us Arod AND Adams? There’s ZERO percent chance we’d net 2 players of that quality by keeping the picks.

- Miami commits to resigning Gesecki, along with hitting the FA market hard for quality O-lineman. It wouldn’t be too hard to imagine most of the decent lineman on the market saying yes to a Miami team that had just added Rodgers and Adams.

- The Defense has enough talent that a new coaching staff should have no problems fielding a competitive unit on that side of the ball. On Offense, a unit that has an improved O-line, Arod at QB, and a nucleus of pass catchers that starts with Adams, Waddle, and Gesecki could be a very impressive group.

While Rodgers isn’t as long of a term answer compared to Watson, I think going this route gives us a few advantages if Miami still decides to move on from Tua after the season: We’ll have a top 5 QB that’s not facing future disciplinary action, including what’s bound to be a lengthy suspension, if spending 2 draft picks on Adams lures Rodgers to Miami, we’ve officially acquired 2 players in the top 5 of their positions for LESS draft capital than it would cost us just to trade for Watson in the offseason, Adams still has a lot of tread on the tires so it’s likely that he’s still catching TD’s for Miami after Rodgers retires, and if we hire a competent GM to replace Grier, Miami would be able to identify/start grooming a young QB to take over after Rodgers retires.

To me, this scenario is SO MUCH more intelligent than continuing down the rabbit hole pursuing Watson in the offseason. In fact, it makes so much sense, I can’t fathom that Ross would be smart enough to make it happen. 🤷🏼‍♂️
As long as our team is so devoid of talent, it doesnt make any sense to splurge on a big name FA at any position.
 
That guy would do great in Miami - he’d create wild fire - get him an o line and a couple of horses at running back and enjoy!

He’d win in Miami!!! Fans would love him too. F Green Bay - enjoy aqua ocean baby!
 
Now that we’ve survived the Watson fiasco (for now), if Tua fails to impress the rest of the season, why not make a run at A-Rod? There’s a ton of reasons to scoff at this, but hear me out. I think I can address all the reasons why it wouldn’t happen:

- ARod doesn’t cost us any draft capital. He’s almost certainly walking away from GB this offseason and still has 3-4 years of high quality football ahead of him IMO.

- Miami can terminate Flores and Grier at the end of the season and tell Arod that he can hand pick his next GM, HC and OC. He’s been frustrated in GB because they never seek his input. In Miami he could finish out his HOF career on his terms with coaches he wants to play for.

- We could be aggressive and bring Devante Adams with him. I’m sure GB will franchise Adams, but Miami could either negotiate with the Packers on compensation and try and to acquire him for something along the lines of a 1st and a 3rd, but even if Miami just bit the bullet and gave up the two #1’s required to sign a tagged player, wouldn’t it be worth it if it netted us Arod AND Adams? There’s ZERO percent chance we’d net 2 players of that quality by keeping the picks.

- Miami commits to resigning Gesecki, along with hitting the FA market hard for quality O-lineman. It wouldn’t be too hard to imagine most of the decent lineman on the market saying yes to a Miami team that had just added Rodgers and Adams.

- The Defense has enough talent that a new coaching staff should have no problems fielding a competitive unit on that side of the ball. On Offense, a unit that has an improved O-line, Arod at QB, and a nucleus of pass catchers that starts with Adams, Waddle, and Gesecki could be a very impressive group.

While Rodgers isn’t as long of a term answer compared to Watson, I think going this route gives us a few advantages if Miami still decides to move on from Tua after the season: We’ll have a top 5 QB that’s not facing future disciplinary action, including what’s bound to be a lengthy suspension, if spending 2 draft picks on Adams lures Rodgers to Miami, we’ve officially acquired 2 players in the top 5 of their positions for LESS draft capital than it would cost us just to trade for Watson in the offseason, Adams still has a lot of tread on the tires so it’s likely that he’s still catching TD’s for Miami after Rodgers retires, and if we hire a competent GM to replace Grier, Miami would be able to identify/start grooming a young QB to take over after Rodgers retires.

To me, this scenario is SO MUCH more intelligent than continuing down the rabbit hole pursuing Watson in the offseason. In fact, it makes so much sense, I can’t fathom that Ross would be smart enough to make it happen. 🤷🏼‍♂️
To be honest there is really no point in asking the question unless you want a bunch of people who have paid little attention to the scenario citing Rodgers age which is instantly invalid as he spent 4 years sitting on the bench. We have plenty of good players and with the most cap space in the NFL and draft picks, we should be able to shake off this year and add to the 10 game win season we had last year with Rodgers. I LOVE the idea. Many on this site lack imagination. All they can see is why it can't work.
 
Last edited:
Because Aaron Rodgers is gonna have a say in it.
And Rodgers has already said in an interview with Lebatard he has no idea where the rumor came from that he would only accept a trade to a west coast team. Said he would be open to anywhere in “your” region as well. No mainstream sports news reported on it because the 49er story was just to juicy.
 
To be honest there is really no point in asking the question unless you want a bunch of people who have paid little attention to the scenario citing Rodgers age which is instantly invalid as he spent 4 years sitting on the bench. We have plenty of good players and with the most cap space in the NFL and draft picks, we should be able to shake off this year and add to the 10 game win season we had last year with Rodgers. I LOVE the idea. Many on this site lack imagination. All they can see is why it can't work.

What's interesting is that many other times when guys that have superior talent have become available you get a swath of people citing why it wont work....then the guy goes someplace else and lights the world on fire...If GB makes Rodgers available and we don't have to mortgage an entire draft for him then we should get him, period.
 
Aaron Rodgers age alone dictates that he goes to a "win now" team. We are no where near being a "win now" team. The Patriots, Saints and maybe some others could benefit, not us.
He had an interview with Lebatard where they talk about Rodgers deciding to retire or return to the Packers this year. Throughout the interview Rodgers talked about he is a perfectionist and how with that, he is nowhere near ready to retire. He also talks about how his love for the game was also a huge factor because he knew deep down he was nowhere near ready to stop playing the game he loves.

I don’t know why but Rodgers has really opened up in a few of his interviews with Lebatard. They really are great listens.
 
Back
Top Bottom