I think Haskins is a bad fit for Miami, because:
1. You're not going to start him as a rookie behind this OL. There are too many holes to fill, particularly if you bypass OL in Round 1. Murray has the athleticism and improvisation to survive. Haskins doesn't.
2. If you're not starting him as a rookie, you should measure him vs the 2020 options. Tua is (I think) clearly a better prospect. Herbert isn't now but could be. Fromm is close to Haskins but safer. Love isn't as good yet but has a higher ceiling. So, even if Miami messes up by winning 4-5 games, they're still likely to have a comparable, and likely better, option available in 2020.
3. The extra year will allow Miami time to build the OL, allow rookies from the 2019 class a year to develop.
4. The same is true of receivers. Miami needs to replace Landry with a high-volume WR who has more big-play ability. There is no go-to receiver on the roster. Ideally, Miami would add a WR in 2019 and another in 2020.
5. Imo Murray is special, and you don't pass on special. Otherwise, Miami is a bad team that needs to right a lot of wrongs before it's in a position to do anything. I think it makes more sense to bring in the QB on Year 2 of the rebuild, where some of the foundation is in place, than Year 1.
If Miami does draft Haskins to sit him for a year, I will understand it, and he will be the best QB prospect they've had since Marino, but - sadly - that's not saying much. Looking for a QB in 2020 makes much more sense - unless you think Haskins is special.
1. You're not going to start him as a rookie behind this OL. There are too many holes to fill, particularly if you bypass OL in Round 1. Murray has the athleticism and improvisation to survive. Haskins doesn't.
2. If you're not starting him as a rookie, you should measure him vs the 2020 options. Tua is (I think) clearly a better prospect. Herbert isn't now but could be. Fromm is close to Haskins but safer. Love isn't as good yet but has a higher ceiling. So, even if Miami messes up by winning 4-5 games, they're still likely to have a comparable, and likely better, option available in 2020.
3. The extra year will allow Miami time to build the OL, allow rookies from the 2019 class a year to develop.
4. The same is true of receivers. Miami needs to replace Landry with a high-volume WR who has more big-play ability. There is no go-to receiver on the roster. Ideally, Miami would add a WR in 2019 and another in 2020.
5. Imo Murray is special, and you don't pass on special. Otherwise, Miami is a bad team that needs to right a lot of wrongs before it's in a position to do anything. I think it makes more sense to bring in the QB on Year 2 of the rebuild, where some of the foundation is in place, than Year 1.
If Miami does draft Haskins to sit him for a year, I will understand it, and he will be the best QB prospect they've had since Marino, but - sadly - that's not saying much. Looking for a QB in 2020 makes much more sense - unless you think Haskins is special.