JepheryRoss
Starter
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2005
- Messages
- 189
- Reaction score
- 1
- Age
- 40
Although Trent Green has put up great QB numbers in the past, lets not forget a few things
(a) He's way past his prime and coming off a concussion that even after his return seemed to leave a mark on him
(b) he's played behind a Kansas City pro-bowl offensive line that we simply dont have (although we have alot of young promising talent, its not to be compared)
(c) he's played with Priest Holmes and Larry Johnson
If you dont think that it can make just about any QB play pretty well just take a look at Damon Huard.
There's simply no reason to grab Trent Green and it really appears to me to be a personal thing with our staff having a history with him (similar to why we drafted Ted Gin)
I personally would like to give Culpepper one more shot, the upside out weighs the downside. We have a reliable back up in Lemon and a young rookie in Beck. If the three of them are all let downs then we make a move next year, but adding Trent Green is NOT going to win us 2 extra games or anything.
(a) He's way past his prime and coming off a concussion that even after his return seemed to leave a mark on him
(b) he's played behind a Kansas City pro-bowl offensive line that we simply dont have (although we have alot of young promising talent, its not to be compared)
(c) he's played with Priest Holmes and Larry Johnson
If you dont think that it can make just about any QB play pretty well just take a look at Damon Huard.
There's simply no reason to grab Trent Green and it really appears to me to be a personal thing with our staff having a history with him (similar to why we drafted Ted Gin)
I personally would like to give Culpepper one more shot, the upside out weighs the downside. We have a reliable back up in Lemon and a young rookie in Beck. If the three of them are all let downs then we make a move next year, but adding Trent Green is NOT going to win us 2 extra games or anything.