How is it misleading? If you give a player a June-1st designation you don't get the total savings until June 1st. Couldn't be any clearer.
How is it misleading? If you give a player a June-1st designation you don't get the total savings until June 1st. Couldn't be any clearer.
Is that true? Because... if so, what's the point on designating them post June 1 cuts? Why don't they just wait until June 2?
Yeah I get why teams would wait until June 2 to cut someone... I just don't get why a team would do it before June 2 if there is no cap relief until June 2. It seems the only people to gain are players. If there is no cap benefit for a team to cut a guy in March and designate him a June cut, why would they? They may as well just ignore his existence until June 2nd then call him in bright and early that morning.The way I understand it....
Essentially a player is released and can pursue gainful employment with another team, but he continues to count towards the team cap until June 1st. After June 1st, the players comes off of the team financials (as a current players) and counts only as "dead money"...why wait, bigger saving (meaning lower "dead money" amount). Each team can roll over money (to be used next season giving them a little more cap room) from the previous season, many times, these post June 1st designations become part of that roll over money
Yeah I get why teams would wait until June 2 to cut someone... I just don't get why a team would do it before June 2 if there is no cap relief until June 2. It seems the only people to gain are players. If there is no cap benefit for a team to cut a guy in March and designate him a June cut, why would they? They may as well just ignore his existence until June 2nd then call him in bright and early that morning.
Surely designating someone as a June cut DOES give more cap space to spend on draft picks / Free Agents in March, given that their contracts won't start until June anyway? It just provides cap savings NEXT year... Which is the same pot of money that teams are spending on draft picks and free agents? If so... The article is a bit stupid!
I think it is done to allow players a chance to be part of the Free Agency period....instead of a "**** you, other team have made their moves, good luck finding work asshole..."
Good. We should be dedicating more of efforts on drafting and developing players anyway.
I think it is done to allow players a chance to be part of the Free Agency period....instead of a "**** you, other team have made their moves, good luck finding work asshole..."