Rubbin420
Marino for President
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2006
- Messages
- 574
- Reaction score
- 0
I see so many comments and even articles questioning our 3rd WR.
(See the Miami Herald Blog on Vick, that calls his return game "dependable yet pedestrian")
IMO Welker did an excellent job at that position and in the slot. When you watched his return game he was 1 man shy of taking it all the way on more than a few occasions.
I see no problem with competition for the WR position, and how it correlates with special teams.
That being the case, I cant see any other player who can do both things as well as Welker.
Hagan was drafted for a reason, but should we be willing to let Welker (who plays like Jeravicious) not get his playing time?
My guess is Hagan and Welker will compete for this position. Let the better WR win, but if Hagan does get the spot, hopefully we can use Welker as much as humanly possible i.e. to spell Booker or Chambers, Returns or 4 WR sets.
Just a thought.
Go phins.
(See the Miami Herald Blog on Vick, that calls his return game "dependable yet pedestrian")
IMO Welker did an excellent job at that position and in the slot. When you watched his return game he was 1 man shy of taking it all the way on more than a few occasions.
I see no problem with competition for the WR position, and how it correlates with special teams.
That being the case, I cant see any other player who can do both things as well as Welker.
Hagan was drafted for a reason, but should we be willing to let Welker (who plays like Jeravicious) not get his playing time?
My guess is Hagan and Welker will compete for this position. Let the better WR win, but if Hagan does get the spot, hopefully we can use Welker as much as humanly possible i.e. to spell Booker or Chambers, Returns or 4 WR sets.
Just a thought.
Go phins.