Without Tannehill, We'd be the Browns (In-depth research) | Page 3 | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Without Tannehill, We'd be the Browns (In-depth research)

Tannchise said:
the last reboot was 2008
Click to expand...

What do you quantify as a reboot? Change in coach? We have had several since 2008. Is it a change in GM? We have had several of those as well.
 
jlfin said:
Tom Brady or Aaron Rodgers makes the Phins a perennial playoff team.
It’s a QB driven league
Click to expand...
Until fans here and the FO realize that, it's 7-9 every year. The reply is always "it's hard to find one." My answer, keep digging
 
with tannehill as starting qb, we have had 2 seasons in his 5 seasons as our starting qb with a worse record or the same as we had without him this year. 2012- 6-10, 2015, 5-11.

in the other 2 seasons, 2013 and 2014, we went a mediocre 8-8, 1 which was an extremely disappointing 8-8 as we lost our final 2 games in 2013, and 2014 we finished on a high note at 8-8.

in 2016 we were 8-5 when tannehill went down, and no one knows how that seasons would have finished with him.

so basically with tannehill we are avg to below avg based and without him pretty much the same.

u want to see a team that looks similar to the browns without there starting qb, look at the packers this season. start 4-1 with rodgers, he goes down, go 3-8 rest of way. that is a team missed there qb in a big way this year. the fins are mediocre at best with tannehill as they have showed us during his time with us .
 
Tannchise said:
without Tanehill we won 6 games. Browns have won 1 game in 2 seasons. Bad post
Click to expand...
I'm sure it would be much better if it said Tannehill sucks, Gase sucks, blow it up!, Without giving facts or examples....then it would be a great post right? Because just having a negative narrative without anything backing it up everyday in numerous threads and posts is much better.. Funny part is I am sure you, like a few others, did not even bother to read it. Predictable
 
Ilovemyfins4eva said:
with tannehill as starting qb, we have had 2 seasons in his 5 seasons as our starting qb with a worse record or the same as we had without him this year. 2012- 6-10, 2015, 5-11.

in the other 2 seasons, 2013 and 2014, we went a mediocre 8-8, 1 which was an extremely disappointing 8-8 as we lost our final 2 games in 2013, and 2014 we finished on a high note at 8-8.

in 2016 we were 8-5 when tannehill went down, and no one knows how that seasons would have finished with him.

so basically with tannehill we are avg to below avg based and without him pretty much the same.

u want to see a team that looks similar to the browns without there starting qb, look at the packers this season. start 4-1 with rodgers, he goes down, go 3-8 rest of way. that is a team missed there qb in a big way this year. the fins are mediocre at best with tannehill as they have showed us during his time with us .
Click to expand...
preach on
 
Ilovemyfins4eva said:
with tannehill as starting qb, we have had 2 seasons in his 5 seasons as our starting qb with a worse record or the same as we had without him this year. 2012- 6-10, 2015, 5-11.

in the other 2 seasons, 2013 and 2014, we went a mediocre 8-8, 1 which was an extremely disappointing 8-8 as we lost our final 2 games in 2013, and 2014 we finished on a high note at 8-8.

in 2016 we were 8-5 when tannehill went down, and no one knows how that seasons would have finished with him.

so basically with tannehill we are avg to below avg based and without him pretty much the same.

u want to see a team that looks similar to the browns without there starting qb, look at the packers this season. start 4-1 with rodgers, he goes down, go 3-8 rest of way. that is a team missed there qb in a big way this year. the fins are mediocre at best with tannehill as they have showed us during his time with us .
Click to expand...

The only reason the team didn't completely implode this season was that of Gase...that talent level is around a 2-4 win team..
 
Tannehill is an 8-8 QB, it couldn't be more obvious, both from watching him play and analyzing his stats.
 
Liphinphan said:
I'm sure it would be much better if it said Tannehill sucks, Gase sucks, blow it up!, Without giving facts or examples....then it would be a great post right? Because just having a negative narrative without anything backing it up everyday in numerous threads and posts is much better.. Funny part is I am sure you, like a few others, did not even bother to read it. Predictable
Click to expand...
Any time he has no retort, your post / question just gets lost into the interwebz
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom