gregorygrant83
Active Roster
Depending on what the team's draft plans are, I might consider a Devante Parker trade to the Bears for Anthony Miller and a 3rd round pick.
Well for one they have restructured his contract 2 times so I doubt they can trade him. Second I don’t want to trade for him, someone asked how we pay for him and the only way I see it is to trade X.Is Mack going to play CB in that scenario? Because if they trade Howard there is going to be a huge whole on the defense at CB and the defense will be worse than last year even with Mack on the defense.
Actually Mack’s contract is very doable only making a little over $2 mil this year following a restructure.Would have to trade X and cut a few others just to sign the draft picks.
What is it with this obsession to get out of the top 10 of this draft?
You are sadly mistaken if you think we aren't hurting at the receiver position. This team needs playmakers badly. Will Fuller isn't enough.Not an obsession on my part, but I do realize there are teams out there who might be willing to make an offer in terms of the number of draft picks they would give us along with 2 or 3 relatively high 1st & second round picks.
If our FO thinks a good enough trade is being offered; one that leaves us in a position to get 5 or more players in the 1st 2 rounds of this draft while allowing Grier to get the players the team needs to improve - GO FOR IT.
We are not hurting at the receiver positions. there could be some improvements made, but the offensive line is a bigger concern. We have improved a fair amount on the offensive line and our current OL players are expected to improve more this year, along with our acquisition of OL FA's. We will still need a good center prospect on the field if FA fails us at that position.
The question isn't really whether we'll bring in another playmaker, it is more a question of at what point will we do this?You are sadly mistaken if you think we aren't hurting at the receiver position. This team needs playmakers badly. Will Fuller isn't enough.
Beat me to it.How you paying Mack?
only reason is say no is because of macks contract... it is tempting thoughOur 1st #6
for
Chicago 1st #20, Mack, WR Mooney, Next year 1or2
You are sadly mistaken if you think we aren't hurting at the receiver position. This team needs playmakers badly. Will Fuller isn't enough.
Man, I totally disagree. While we have some of the best WR prospects in a while this draft to choose from in the top 10, there are many WR that could ultimately be better than the 4 projected at the top. Bateman, Toney, Elijah Moore, Terrace Marshall, etc.There will NOT be a great WR at 18. All the potentially great WR’s will be long gone by the 18th pick. The best they will get if they trade away the 6th pick and move down to the 20th pick would be an average WR at 18. That is why they would need Robinson as part of the trade to move down to 20. That would allow them to draft other positions of need and not even be concerned with drafting a WR early in the draft.
There will NOT be a great WR at 18. All the potentially great WR’s will be long gone by the 18th pick. The best they will get if they trade away the 6th pick and move down to the 20th pick would be an average WR at 18. That is why they would need Robinson as part of the trade to move down to 20. That would allow them to draft other positions of need and not even be concerned with drafting a WR early in the draft.