MiamiDolphins34
Active Roster
Problem is the 1st rounders would be low. We could still get a pretty good LT1st Cutler 1st and a Michael Huff or Bernard Pollard Max Gilles (unlikely) a LB or CB with the 2nd.
dolphan117 said:Depends where all the picks end up. Who is there second first from?
MiamiDolphins34 said:Redskins higher than the broncos' but not too high either.
Jimmy James said:It depends on far too many factors to say for sure at this point, but I would be supportive of such a trade as long as the deal came close to being a decent value. Trading away the #2 for those picks would be insane -- the Broncos would have to throw in their 2007 first rounder and possibly other picks. Trading away the #10 pick for them would make a great deal of sense. I should mention that I'm assuming the picks would be around #18 and around #26.
What I am willing to say is that all things being equal, Miami is in a position where two solid eventual starters at the right positions would make more sense than one even better day one starter does.