Wr's Frustrated With Brock | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Wr's Frustrated With Brock

sinPHIN said:


I don't see how the brock lovers don't see it.... its clear that even though ryan is not elite, he makes most of those throws quite easily
Click to expand...


How are we still averaging more PPG with Brock, with all these missed opportunities and apparantely all the made ones with Ryan Tannehill.

:shrug:

If we were playing 7 on 7 with no rushing the QB rules, he probably would be the Tom Brady of that sport, but Sunday football he and Brock run a more similar race than should be possible.
 
Third Eye said:
Tannehill is significantly better that Oz on long throws. It’s shocking how bad Oz is on these.
Click to expand...

Keep in mind, Tanny struggled in this area for a while . . . But year 4 with Stills and Parker, year 3 with Grant, full offseason with the majority of the reps . . . .timing is no doubt much better with these guys as is the familiarity.

Brock throws a nice enough ball but he has no clue on distance or speed with this group. Ot sure if it has a chance to get better.

If he adds the downfield accuracy and just scrambles forward when pushed up in the pocket, he could make some really solid gains behind center.
 
I am not sure there are legit "Brock lovers". Id hope most everyone agrees he is not a good NFL QB. However, he does do some things that tannehill doesnt do that are beneficial to the team. However, today was not one of those days. Tannehill is still better than him for the most part, and if RT was in there today we would of scored more points. But I think a couple other games that wasn't the case, and a couple games it has been. Tannehill is still better. They are just dramatically different players and bring different strengths and weaknesses.
 
Kdawg954 said:
How are we still averaging more PPG with Brock, with all these missed opportunities and apparantely all the made ones with Ryan Tannehill.

:shrug:

If we were playing 7 on 7 with no rushing the QB rules, he probably would be the Tom Brady of that sport, but Sunday football he and Brock run a more similar race than should be possible.
Click to expand...

Each game is different, but today we won the field position battle for most of the game, giving us a shorter field to work with.

I wish people would stop saying things like, 'well we are averaging a few more points per game, so that proves this or that'. No, it proves nothing about an individual player. ESPECIALLY when there's so many variables on a play to play basis.
 
Nappy Roots said:
I am not sure there are legit "Brock lovers". Id hope most everyone agrees he is not a good NFL QB. However, he does do some things that tannehill doesnt do that are beneficial to the team. However, today was not one of those days. Tannehill is still better than him for the most part, and if RT was in there today we would of scored more points. But I think a couple other games that wasn't the case, and a couple games it has been. Tannehill is still better. They are just dramatically different players and bring different strengths and weaknesses.
Click to expand...

Be careful, some will assume you think RT is a HOF now.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom