Valandui
Lumberjack Batman
- Joined
- May 11, 2008
- Messages
- 10,211
- Reaction score
- 35
http://www.sun-sentinel.com/sports/...(Miami+Dolphins+/+South+Florida+Sun-Sentinel)
But they will call that BS on Camarillo AND fine him?If it was our guy laying the opposing quarterback out, would you be complaining?
It was a clean hit, it was OBVIOUS he wasn't trying to take a malicious blow on Pat, so I don't know what your gripe is. Hell, I even remember clearly he got TRIPPED which caused the contact to be worse.
If it was our guy laying the opposing quarterback out, would you be complaining?
It was a clean hit, it was OBVIOUS he wasn't trying to take a malicious blow on Pat, so I don't know what your gripe is. Hell, I even remember clearly he got TRIPPED which caused the contact to be worse.
But they will call that BS on Camarillo AND fine him?
But they will call that BS on Camarillo AND fine him?
Exactly, how was that malicious intent, right?
If it was our guy laying the opposing quarterback out, would you be complaining?
It was a clean hit, it was OBVIOUS he wasn't trying to take a malicious blow on Pat, so I don't know what your gripe is. Hell, I even remember clearly he got TRIPPED which caused the contact to be worse.
BS, bottom line was that it was helmet to helmet contact, which isn't allowed in the NFL. Don't believe intent is a required element for the infraction to take place.
As someone noted earlier, when you compare that to Cam getting fined it's a complete f****** joke.
Then why did they fine Wilson earlier in the season for hitting a WR with the helmet? :confused: So you can hit a runner but not a WR? :confused:
If it was our guy laying the opposing quarterback out, would you be complaining?
It was a clean hit, it was OBVIOUS he wasn't trying to take a malicious blow on Pat, so I don't know what your gripe is. Hell, I even remember clearly he got TRIPPED which caused the contact to be worse.