IOL is very likely a greater need, but that was not in question. It was saying those of us who consider Newton and Murphy as being good values aren't thinking straight because our craving for one of them is so great we cannot look at things objectively. I would rather take an IDL than take an OL of lower value if the ones ranked above Newton and Murphy are gone. Reaching for need at OL gives you Billy Milner instead of Derrick Brooks and Vernon Carey instead of Vince Wilfork.
Who says you're looking at it objectively? You're assuming that the DTs in this draft are all going to be better players than the IOLs, 'just because', so we MUST take one of them to get another Wilkins!
Not only is that silly thinking, but that doesn't fill the team's biggest glaring NEED.