Then how come he did not do better than 54% completion percentage, how come he had 9 interceptions on 17 touchdowns? Is that what you would call a great prospect? Based on what? Your beliefs?
You do know you shat on Herbert who had 67% completion percentage, 32 TDs and 6 Ints, so the question is where do you pull your evaluations from?
I pull mine from a place that works. Unlike you trying to insinuate that J.T. Barrett and Logan Woodside were #1 overall pick worthy.
I rarely miss - and when I do it’s not by more than 2 degrees of separation. For example, a player that I believe is average may end up above average or below average. But he won’t be great, and he won’t be terrible. It ain’t gonna happen. I don’t miss by that much.
A player that I believe is going to be great, won’t be worse than above average. A player that I believe is not a good prospect at all, won’t be better than below average.
You miss wildly. Like complete whiffs off the planet. Over and over and over again. You’re comparing apples and oranges.
Has Herbert even thrown a TD pass this month? I know it’s been a few weeks at least. In the big picture, he’s above average. Right where I believed he would be.
You’re rarely the same quarterback at age 25 that you are at age 20 when you’re as young, talented, and inexperienced as Anthony Richardson is. He won’t be either.
If you’re going to go down in the NFL - and make no mistake, every coach and GM in the NFL goes down - you go down betting on guys like Anthony Richardson.
You don’t go down betting on guys like Tanner Mordecai.
Richardson’s talent level is in the realm of Mahomes and Josh Allen. A top 3 QB in the league.
Anybody can evaluate box score stats. That’s not a talent evaluator. That’s an accountant.