Why do people think USC will not get punished if there was any school involvement? They punished the most dominant College Football program (Alabama) some years ago for about 3 years of bowl-ineligability. So why would it not happen to USC??
MiamiMan147 said:Alabama dominant? This isn't the 1970's.
And right now the NCAA has as much ability to punish Reggie Bush as my high school Math teacher has the ability to send me to detention.
They punished the most dominant College Football program (Alabama) some years ago for about 3 years of bowl-ineligability
Avigatorx said:He could lose his heisman.
burger13 said:This is probably a weird question.....but they couldn't take back his trophy, right?? I know that they could refuse to recognize him any more....and list the award as vacant for '05....but they couldn't actually repossess the trophy I don't think. They gave it to him....so it's his property now. I wonder how that would work........
just one of the many stupid things that goes through my mind. :goof: