No, I dont. Thats one game too many!Why? Are the rest of the worlds countries not good enough to hold an NFL game? You have Aussies playing in the NFL, playing college football, but you dont want the game expanded world wide. Its one game a year.
No, I dont. Thats one game too many!Why? Are the rest of the worlds countries not good enough to hold an NFL game? You have Aussies playing in the NFL, playing college football, but you dont want the game expanded world wide. Its one game a year.
Its not that they are not good enough. In a bubble I think that would be a great experience for everyone involved.Why? Are the rest of the worlds countries not good enough to hold an NFL game? You have Aussies playing in the NFL, playing college football, but you dont want the game expanded world wide. Its one game a year.
Thought the Fins had Brazil as their international country?
Why ain't we playing then?
Can they change with the Rams so the Dolphins can play Down Under please.
Agree @Buff ?
I think the Fins were assigned to Spain, which is great for me! 20 years here in Madrid, and I now have the chance to bring my son to see my beloved Fins!
Then it’s 2, then it’s 5, then there are foreign teams, and that changes the league to its DNA.Why? Are the rest of the worlds countries not good enough to hold an NFL game? You have Aussies playing in the NFL, playing college football, but you dont want the game expanded world wide. Its one game a year.
The 'real' reason they push this is to alleviate the flack teams get when they call themselves world champions of a sport only played in one country (I'll leave out Canada for obvious reasons).Then it’s 2, then it’s 5, then there are foreign teams, and that changes the league to its DNA.
Yes that’s a worst-case scenario, but unless that scenario wouldn’t end up with a windfall for the NFL, it is possible.
Ya...DGAF about all that. As soon as there's another professional league on the NFL's level somewhere around the world, they'll have a point.The 'real' reason they push this is to alleviate the flack teams get when they call themselves world champions of a sport only played in one country (I'll leave out Canada for obvious reasons).
Now you know.
To me that's a really interesting game to attend depending on the opponent.Probably a good bet the Phins are the "home" team in the '25 Madrid game. AFC gets 9 home games in '25, Spain is a marketing rights country for the Phins , it's "gonna" happen.
https://operations.nfl.com/updates/...dition-of-two-new-clubs-and-four-new-markets/
Easiest was to do a game in Australia, is 2 teams play on the Sunday US time, fly to Australia Monday, then play a game in Australia on the following Monday (Sunday Night your time) fly home Tuesday, arrive home Tuesday then have the bye week, Its not that difficult at all.Its not that they are not good enough. In a bubble I think that would be a great experience for everyone involved.
The travel schedule absolutely sucks though. There is a known advantage in hosting a team that has to travel from coast to coast as the travel team does not usually play to 100%. Now double that air time and then throw in different languages, cultures, and germs. Its a recipe for a bad product when squeezed into a 1 week window.
Send some preseason games overseas and give both teams an extra week off to adapt to their surroundings and not rush.
The half naked female kind in g strings.I was really looking forward to seeing some Brazilian action.