With all due respect to these guys who do this on this site, but take away all the draft grading information they have now (magazines, websites, interviews, print media), and allow them to only watch film, and then have them grade players on their own and see how accurate they are.
I would bet these two things:
1. They would do a much better job at projecting pro talent, and what "value" they are as far as rounds, than I would.
2. They would miss on several players (seeing as many as 50% of first round picks are busts).
You can view skills, lifting numbers, running speeds until you're blue in the face, but that doesn't mean anything when they get out on the field. You can watch tape of them on the field, but will it translate? How will these guys handle the pressure, fame, money of it all? What kind of heart and work ethic is in these guys?
That's why this is such a hard thing to do, and projecting college players to the pros is not an exact science. One person shows evidence of when Kiper is wrong, to discredit him, but doesn't point out the bust rate of first round picks.
Bottom line: It's an inexact science, and I'm confident in Bill Parcells and his crew to do their homework, evaluate all possibilities, and do their best to make the best pick possible for the future of this franchise. After that, who knows what will happen.