OCD #'s thread

[Montana-phan]

Excuse my OCD rant here for a minute, but I cannot be the only one whom gets just a little "twitchy" when I see some of our players numbers.

Our starting linebackers don't have a single number in the 50's among the bunch. Timmons, that #94 is killing me from the inside.

Love Tunsil, but come on man, a number in the 70's would fill my heart with peace.

I can only hope that after cuts our rookie DT's will get a 90's number. 50's on the d-line is just wrong.

And while I am at it, can my WR's please wear a number in the 80's? Thank you Caroo, 88 looks great!

That is all, I could not hold it in any longer.

 

[BenchFiedler]

http://www.med.upenn.edu/ctsa/ocd_treatment.html

Treatment for OCD... Brother give them a call right away for treatment... You need it lol

 

[abNORMal]

don't like linebacker numbers in the 40's but that 94 on Timmons looks sweet!!

 

[greasyObnoxious]

http://m.ranker.com/list/62-images-that-will-trigger-your-ocd/brian-gilmore

 

[royalshank]

Haha. I admit, I feel similarly about these. I prefer my wideout wearing numbers in the 80's. The only time I ever thought a number outside this range was cool was Ken Burrough's "00". A LB w number 40-49 looks 10 lbs smaller than when he wears 50-59. 94 for a LB - I'm ok w that. It's the 40's that drive me nuts. Come to think of it, numbers in the 40-49 range are usually reserved for scrubby d-backs, long-snappers, 3rd string H-backs and other insignificant positions (historically for the most part). No one looks cool in a 40's jersey outside of some of the great #44 players like Chuck Foreman. Meh.