LtDan
I am a Dan but not a Lt.
Yes, very trueSlappy8800 said:those are called...rookie, #3 WR numbers
Yes, very trueSlappy8800 said:those are called...rookie, #3 WR numbers
yes... but they are disappointing for a first round pick.Slappy8800 said:those are called...rookie, #3 WR numbers
Jenkins will be a stud like that once he has a QB who can throw the ballfinsnchips said:yes... but they are disappointing for a first round pick.
...my point; however, is that they are not the numbers of a stud WR - Michael Clayton, Roy Williams and Larry Fitzgerald are studs.
Slappy8800 said:those are called...rookie, #3 WR numbers
finsnchips said:58 recpts 780 yards 8 TDs
good rookie numbers... without a QB.
ahh... reggie got owned.Finz Fury said:Sorry to make you guys re live this, but here's the catch. I can't remember being more bitter after a game. Oh well, those days are gone.
finsnchips said:ahh... reggie got owned.
yeah, I think Reggie's problem was that he played nickel last year and struggled in space... he is a starting CB and couldn't make the step down.Finz Fury said:Yep. I sure hope he is more comfortable with the defense this year. He has some big payday's to live up to.
:barf:Finz Fury said:Sorry to make you guys re live this, but here's the catch. I can't remember being more bitter after a game. Oh well, those days are gone.
LtDan662002 said:Jenkins will be a stud like that once he has a QB who can throw the ball
NOTE: And no, Vick can't throw accurately