Amars
Championship or nothing.
Nappy Roots said:their in the SEC, why the hell would they schedule a incredibly hard non-conference schedule?
that would be moronic.
Why not? If they are the best prove it.
Nappy Roots said:their in the SEC, why the hell would they schedule a incredibly hard non-conference schedule?
that would be moronic.
Amars said:Why not? If they are the best prove it.
UF Fin Kat said:that's not true at all. if rutgers schedules a game at ohio state and OSU barely escapes with a win, they're never going to schedule them again.
LSU....done,FIN-STONE said:There Are 3 Big Big East Teams West Va. , Louisville,
And Now Rutgers... The Sec Has Been A Powerhouse Forever And
Still Is Lsu , Auburn And Florida Will Be There Till The End..
SECfootball said:Almost every school in the SEC schedules at least one quality out of conference team. You can't say the same about Big East schools.
nyjunc said:When you are on the bottom you need to be flexible, don't expect a home and home. Go on the road and play big teams first, prove you are worthy and the home and homes will follow.
MikeO said:Cincy--Ohio St, VT
Syracuse--Iowa, Wake Forest
WV---Maryland (who will play for the ACC championship probably)
L'ville---Miami, Kentucky
Pitt---Virigina, Mich St
UCONN--Wake Forest, Indiana, Navy
Rutgers--Navy
at least 1.....I think so. I know you might laugh at Navy but they are 7-3 this year agaisnt a solid schedule.
Kev83 said:So for sure I'll give you Ohio St, VT, and Iowa.
Great post, pal.
MikeO said:Cincy--Ohio St, VT
Syracuse--Iowa, Wake Forest
WV---Maryland (who will play for the ACC championship probably)
L'ville---Miami, Kentucky
Pitt---Virigina, Mich St
UCONN--Wake Forest, Indiana, Navy
Rutgers--Navy
at least 1.....I think so. I know you might laugh at Navy but they are 7-3 this year agaisnt a solid schedule.
LouPhinFan said:Why would a school like Louisville sign a contract for one away game? :confused: That would be pretty stupid. Smaller schools do that for the money, but U of L no longer falls under that classification.
MikeO said:WF and Maryland aren't quality?? Maryland will be playing for the ACC title, they aren't quality. LOL LOL LOL LOL OL
Ok nuff said. You better go re-write!
UF Fin Kat said:really nitpicking here. maryland is a good team who could win the ACC. same with wake forest. they're out of conference teams, and they're good. going overboard just to prove a point means you have no point.
MikeO said:WF and Maryland aren't quality?? Maryland will be playing for the ACC title, they aren't quality. LOL LOL LOL LOL OL
Ok nuff said. You better go re-write!
Kev83 said:MikeO,
I asked you to give some kind of criterion (I know thats hard) for distinguishing these teams. Is it how good they were anticipated to be when scheduled or how well they are currently performing? As I said in my post, that dwindles your list down even more.
Example a) Miami Hurricanes favorerd to do well, and a perennial powerhouse. This year, well, not so much.
Example b) Wake Forest the bottom of the ACC when scheduled and known by little more than a few offensive players from their past. This year they're in the ACC hunt (along with mediocore Maryland).
So, which is it?
I'd like to give you 50% of that original list (so the better answer is to say how the teams are performing now). Just say that, pal. Then I'll give you an extra team or two.
Any reason why you're so non-SEC? Grow up playing field hockey?
They're really nothing to brag about, MikeO.MikeO said:I would give a more in-depth response, but with your personal shots Im not going to waste my time in childish games. But.....
Im not non-SEC.
i live in reality. You can't say Maryland and WF are not a good OOC team to play when they might win the ACC