Thread Ban

Discussion in 'Questions and Suggestions Forum' started by MadDog 88, Sep 25, 2013.

  1. MadDog 88

    MadDog 88 Smoke 'em Jay Finheaven VIP

    Joined:
    Jul 2008
    Messages:
    16,514
    Likes Received:
    420
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Mystery solved. Explanation needed. Why are you guys allowing people to select who can or can't participate in a thread? This defies the principles of customer service and borders on a discriminatory practice. After all this is a public message board supported by paying members.

    Imagine if I was to create a thread and banned every mod or admin. Of course I am sure that can't be done but I'm sure you get the point. I'd like to hear an explanation of this and it should be advertised to the board if this is the kind of policy your going to put in place.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 25, 2013
  2. ROADRUNNER

    ROADRUNNER FinHeaven VIP Finheaven VIP Donator

    Joined:
    Dec 2008
    Messages:
    9,430
    Likes Received:
    30
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Sent your question up stairs............
     
  3. Wildbill3

    Wildbill3 Misery Loves Company Administrator Finheaven VIP

    Joined:
    Dec 2001
    Messages:
    28,350
    Likes Received:
    308
    Trophy Points:
    83
    The thread ban is just another tool for the mods to use to keep a thread on topic. I'm sure you can see the value of removing someone from a conversation that is derailing a thread by talking smack to one particular member. Sometimes two members collide on a subject and go at each other. A thread ban is just a step down from being removed from the the forum for a few days. I know which one I'd rather do to keep an otherwise good poster active. Also the staff is not going to just remove someone from a thread without using good judgement. If you find you're being removed from threads for no particular reason (harassment) by all means report it and it'll be looked into.
     
  4. MadDog 88

    MadDog 88 Smoke 'em Jay Finheaven VIP

    Joined:
    Jul 2008
    Messages:
    16,514
    Likes Received:
    420
    Trophy Points:
    83
    I disagree Bill and we already had one thread that banned at least 50 people right from the start. I'm not going to call his name but he wanted a thread that he knew his opinion wouldn't be contested. I can understand your point about wanting to keep a thread going but if you want to allow for a thread to continue without suspending someone maybe you should look at the mods banning a poster from a thread, not the creator of the thread choosing who and who can't participate. The potential for this to blow up is substantial in my opinion.
     
  5. DisturbedShifty

    DisturbedShifty Wort-wort-wort!!! Administrator Finheaven VIP

    Joined:
    Apr 2006
    Messages:
    14,615
    Likes Received:
    621
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So does that mean a mod banned all those people in that thread that MadDog mentioned? I was under the impression that it was the original poster did the banning, not a mod.

    Never go to the Library without your shotgun.
     
  6. Wildbill3

    Wildbill3 Misery Loves Company Administrator Finheaven VIP

    Joined:
    Dec 2001
    Messages:
    28,350
    Likes Received:
    308
    Trophy Points:
    83
    which thread? and I've removed the thread creation ban option. that won't happen again.
     
  7. Gonzo

    Gonzo Widerstand Administrator Finheaven VIP Donator

    Joined:
    Mar 2004
    Messages:
    29,084
    Likes Received:
    725
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I think that is what he was referring to more than the staff option.
     
  8. Wildbill3

    Wildbill3 Misery Loves Company Administrator Finheaven VIP

    Joined:
    Dec 2001
    Messages:
    28,350
    Likes Received:
    308
    Trophy Points:
    83
    yes, and it's a staff only tool now. Like it was supposed to be. Anyway, my bad, and now it's fixed.
     

Share This Page