OL
WR
OL
Edge
OL
S
OL
DT
OL
CB
OL
OL
OL
WR
OL
Edge
OL
S
OL
DT
OL
CB
OL
OL
OL
I think our special teams allocation takes up 2 percent of the salary cap pie, which is on-line with most teams.
Sanders had a really good bounce back season last year and is a veteran entering his prime. If he remains confident then I'd like to keep him. I understand that a rookie kicker costs less, but rookie kickers aren't always better. Why create a problem for 3 million in savings?
Sanders has gone through ups and downs, but last year was an up for him. He should be considering his salary, but he's not the only veteran kicker making that kind of money.
OL
WR
OL
Edge
OL
S
OL
DT
OL
CB
OL
OL
OL
His "bounce back" year still saw him only ranked as the 18th best kicker by % last year. After being 26th and 29th the 2 years before that. While he's the 12th highest paid kicker.
Seems like the strongest argument you can make to keep him is that he's simply just been here. A game winning 29 yard FG against the Cowboys doesn't make me sentimental.
Money is going to be hard to come by in the next few years so getting rid of a below average kicker makes a lot of sense.
If I can get similar production (with a stronger leg) from a 7th round pick, its a no brainer. If I don't have a shot at a quality prospect, status quo will have to do, I am not looking to dump him for just any random kicker.
To many holes to fill to be going BPA .1. BPA
2. BPA
3. BPA
4. BPA
5. BPA
This is how you draft
Guess his 57,52,54, and 35 yard field goals that made a 29 yard game winner possible. Doesn’t make you sentimental either, but you left them out.His "bounce back" year still saw him only ranked as the 18th best kicker by % last year. After being 26th and 29th the 2 years before that. While he's the 12th highest paid kicker.
Seems like the strongest argument you can make to keep him is that he's simply just been here. A game winning 29 yard FG against the Cowboys doesn't make me sentimental.
Money is going to be hard to come by in the next few years so getting rid of a below average kicker makes a lot of sense.
If I can get similar production (with a stronger leg) from a 7th round pick, its a no brainer. If I don't have a shot at a quality prospect, status quo will have to do, I am not looking to dump him for just any random kicker.
Guess his 57,52,54, and 35 yard field goals that made a 29 yard game winner possible. Doesn’t make you sentimental either, but you left them out.
So you believe McD is going to drastically alter his offense for a rookie TE, a position that is a notoriously difficult transition from college to pro?TE becomes number 1 for me if BB is there when we draft.
If we plan on keeping Waddle, we need to get to that negotiating table asap or we're screwed!St. Brown just got 30 Mil a year for 4 years. We need WR because we wont be able to keep Hill and Waddle. Waddle is going to command 35 Mil a year.
That St. Brown contract looks bigger than it possibly is in reality. Only 75m guaranteed (only...lol).If we plan on keeping Waddle, we need to get to that negotiating table asap or we're screwed!
Don’t know, I’m not on speaking terms with McDaniel. This thread is about what I’d do, not how I think McDaniel would alter his offense.So you believe McD is going to drastically alter his offense for a rookie TE, a position that is a notoriously difficult transition from college to pro?
Would you bring in a new HC?Don’t know, I’m not on speaking terms with McDaniel. This thread is about what I’d do, not how I think McDaniel would alter his offense.