Dmarino110
Starter
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2005
- Messages
- 2,230
- Reaction score
- 114
It looks like we have a bunch of important guys we need to lock up...
All depends on the new coach at this point. Soliai will not be worth his contract in a 4-3 defense...I definitely want Soliai re-signed. Langford too because we have developed him and he is solid against the run. I don't like the idea of developing a young guy and then letting him walk as he enters his prime.
No way, no how should we let Soliai walk. It does us no good to fill other holes and then let leaks spring up by letting developing players walk.
I feel good that we will re-sign Soliai and Langford. I'm sure Ireland wants them back at their age.
Starks, Odrick would be a great DT duo, backed up by Mcdaniels. We sure wouldnt have to spend big bucks there...I think Soliai would still be an immovable force as a DT in a 4-3. Look at how the Vikes played a couple of years ago when they had the Williams "brothers" at DT. No one could run on them for a 2-3 year period. Soliai brings that ability and he would be a good DT in a 4-3 IMO. Remember Ireland follows the "planet theory." There are only so many big guys out there. He could play similarly to Tim Bowens when we had a 4-3 some time back. Starks would play the Daryl Gardner position. Odrick and Wake at DE. I think it would work, but I want Soliai back. We lose him, and suddenly we need to put a high draft choice or other resource at DT. No thank you.
If we lose both Soliai and Langford
why didn't we trade them this past season for "anything"
knowing we had no interest in resigning both.