GBpackers10
Active Roster
That Rosen beat us in Lambeau last season? I think you guys will be good with him. Tannehill was ok but never got over the 7-9 8-8 record. I
Best wishes to Miami this season.
Best wishes to Miami this season.
Thanks brother. Best of luck to you this year!That Rosen beat us in Lambeau last season? I think you guys will be good with him. Tannehill was ok but never got over the 7-9 8-8 record. I
Best wishes to Miami this season.
But he did get them close enough for 6yd and 8 yd rushing TDs, and 3 FGs from less than 45 yds out. So there's that.Rosen was 11/26 with 149 yards and 0 TDs in that game. Lets not credit him with that win....
All the optimism on Rosen is what worries me the most. I would rather think he is going to suck and be pleasantly surprised when I am wrong or I will be right.
The guy threw 11 TD's and 14 int's in 14 games last year. That is averaging less than a TD per game and 1 int per game. Those are very bad analytical indicators.
I have no hope for this guy and think Fitzpatrick would play better for us, but I do hope that I am completely wrong.
So you have no hope based on last year's TD/Int ratio?All the optimism on Rosen is what worries me the most. I would rather think he is going to suck and be pleasantly surprised when I am wrong or I will be right.
The guy threw 11 TD's and 14 int's in 14 games last year. That is averaging less than a TD per game and 1 int per game. Those are very bad analytical indicators.
I have no hope for this guy and think Fitzpatrick would play better for us, but I do hope that I am completely wrong.
Serious question: Why are you concerned that other people are optimistic?
Did you ever stop and assess the situationAll the optimism on Rosen is what worries me the most. I would rather think he is going to suck and be pleasantly surprised when I am wrong or I will be right.
The guy threw 11 TD's and 14 int's in 14 games last year. That is averaging less than a TD per game and 1 int per game. Those are very bad analytical indicators.
I have no hope for this guy and think Fitzpatrick would play better for us, but I do hope that I am completely wrong.
Did you ever stop and assess the situation
He/team was in last year, or are you a box score guy.
It concerns me because everyone on this site always wrong about everything and then they do the standard revionist excuse making for thinking ridiculous notions. Like when people liked and still think Tannehill was the answer for us with a better oline when he obviously wasnt since the moment we drafted him.
These rose colored homer glasses do not allow for logical assesement of simple metrics. Furthermore the media is also calling this a slam dunk, yet they are all mostly prognosticating that we will pick first or be a bottom feeder team that will go for a QB again next year. How does that make sense?
What that lets me know is that the media, thinks we got a good deal for a very bad player. So much so that they are predicting us to go from the 13th worst team last year to a bottom 5 bad team this coming year. Why would that make me optimistic?
I think we are illusioned with what the media says but I think the media knows less about the Phins then us fans do... And we fans know jack squat... Me included... But I can do math... And the statistical indicators do not bode well for us.
Hopefully this is one of those areas where numbers dont quite describe the tale of the tape. But those instances arent common.