2003 draft

[Dphins4me]

so just because you're a 4 year vet makes u priviledged to automatically start even though he nevers makes a big play (int, fumble)...

Usually, when you are doing everything else correctly.

all im saying is if moore was so good, we would have seen him get a valid chance, which we havent...

Who said Moore was so good? I think its he has not be around long enough to judge.

therefore Hyde's source CAN be right......

It might be right. However many young players start out low. No one has said Moore is a future HOF or even PB. He is just getting his NFL feet under him. He missed his entire rookie season.

everything else we're arguing is semantics... the 2003 should be consider a bust as of right now, with SMITH, MOORE, AND WHITLEY leading the pack... any other questions???

No one is arguing the draft class is suspect. Moore was not the pick anyone wanted outside DW.

 

[Dphins4me]

moore= just about as much of a bust as fletcher.... ok now im done

Start something then when faced with obvious errors in your judgement you run and hide. Does not surprise me.

 

[darkoak]

Start something then when faced with obvious errors in your judgement you run and hide. Does not surprise me.

I don't think there is much to more to say about Moore either. He's here to save face firstmost and to play secondly.

 

[Dphins4me]

I don't think there is much to more to say about Moore either. He's here to save face firstmost and to play secondly.

What do you mean here to save face?

You are acting like he played last year and sucked. Whos job is he going to take? Seau? Greenwood? Just who do you expect him to bump from the lineup?

 

[PhinstiGator]

the link is meaningless. Unless the source is named, I could be the source.

The source is Dan Rather. It must be true.