#25: Dan Marino | The Top 100: Nfl's Greatest Players (2010)

Discussion in 'Miami Dolphins Forum' started by DKphin, Aug 11, 2018 at 10:30 PM.

  1. DKphin

    DKphin A True Fan Donator

    Joined:
    Aug 2008
    Messages:
    11,564
    Likes Received:
    1,912
    Trophy Points:
    113
  2. phinfan33

    phinfan33 A True Fan

    Joined:
    Jun 2005
    Messages:
    4,889
    Likes Received:
    208
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Dan Marino was a joy to watch play.
     
  3. Vaark

    Vaark Nihil taurus crappus Finheaven VIP Donator

    Joined:
    Apr 2007
    Messages:
    25,161
    Likes Received:
    3,266
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It's late, admittedly I didnt watch the video but I would be hard-pressed to name a dozen better players than Dan, let alone 24!!
     
  4. Mach2

    Mach2 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2018
    Messages:
    199
    Likes Received:
    206
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Greatest pure "passer" in the history of the NFL. I suppose it's debatable, but I'm not sure who you would compare him to. The quick release, and pocket evasiveness was unreal. The velocity, and accuracy was second to none.

    Having said that, I don't think he was the best "quarterback". IMO that has to go to Montana, or (I hate to admit it) Brady.
     
  5. NBP81

    NBP81 Yippi ka yay mother******! Finheaven VIP Donator

    Joined:
    Jan 2008
    Messages:
    7,185
    Likes Received:
    2,678
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I think not winning a Super Bowl played substantial role in him not being in the top 10...
     
    Michael Scott and superphin like this.
  6. Mach2

    Mach2 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2018
    Messages:
    199
    Likes Received:
    206
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Thet is true, to some extent, with "casual" fans. A lot of recognition comes with being champion.

    The hardcore fan knows that it almost always takes a complete team, or a completely dominant team on one side of the ball to win it all. Those knowledgeable, that saw Dan play (even those that disliked him), realize that as an individual talent, he had few, if any peers. He put balls in windows that most wouldn't even attempt. I don't know, off hand, what his TD/INT ratio was, but I think half his INTs were on the receiver not getting his head around in time.
     
  7. quasi

    quasi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2010
    Messages:
    324
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Aaron Rodgers has surpassed him as greatest pure passer
     
  8. Goin` Deep

    Goin` Deep "Pick your guy...and let it fly." Finheaven VIP Donator

    Joined:
    May 2004
    Messages:
    3,517
    Likes Received:
    825
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I loved Marino and if I had to pick one quarterback to start a team, I'd take him, but he's not the best quarterback that ever played. Not winning a Super Bowl is huge when discussing his legacy. Joe Montana imo, is the greatest quarterback of all-time.
     
    Mach2 likes this.
  9. Mach2

    Mach2 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2018
    Messages:
    199
    Likes Received:
    206
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Actually that is one of the few QBs that came to mind as I posted. You could make that case, but I will stick with Marino.

    Sheer talent you could point to Geoff George, but he was such a cancer, and a-hole, that he is irrelevant.
     
    Viggen likes this.
  10. Mach2

    Mach2 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2018
    Messages:
    199
    Likes Received:
    206
    Trophy Points:
    43
    The game has changed so much that its difficult to compare eras by stats alone. I agree with Montana. Montana/Walsh forever changed the dynamics of the game. The way PI is officiated today has really watered down passing statistics. Montana was a surgeon, and his grasp of offensive football was far beyond his contemporaries.

    If Dan played today, with the way DBs aren't allowed any physicality at all, he would have thrown for 6500 yds, and 50 TDs on a regular basis.

    Some younger posters who have only seen highlights, don't really get the whole picture of how Marino could shred a defense almost at will. At the time, many had the view that he was too prolific as a scorer, because the d never got to rest during long drives.

    He had no running game that the apposing D had to respect. It didn't matter.
     
    royalshank likes this.
  11. FSU Truth

    FSU Truth Taggart is my Homeboy Finheaven VIP

    Joined:
    Oct 2013
    Messages:
    10,557
    Likes Received:
    2,552
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Brady, Montana, Unitas, Manning, then I think you get to the next grouping of Marino, Favre, Elway. It is funny how many will consistently discuss how much Brady elevates that team, and there have been years where there is questionable talent on that roster.

    Here is the list...
    25 - Dan Marino - QB

    24 - John Hannah - G

    23 - John Elway - QB

    22 - Gale Sayers - RB

    21 - Tom Brady - QB

    20 - Brett Favre - QB

    19 - Bronko Nagurski - FB

    18 - Ray Lewis - LB

    17 - Barry Sanders - RB

    16 - Otto Graham - QB

    15 - Deacon Jones - DE

    14 - Sammy Baugh - QB/DB/P

    13 - Joe Greene - DT

    12 - Anthony Munoz - LT

    11 - Ronnie Lott - S

    10 - Dick Butkus - LB

    9 - Don Hutson - WR

    8 - Peyton Manning - QB

    7 - Reggie White - DE

    6 - Johnny Unitas - QB

    5 - Walter Payton - RB

    4 - Joe Montana - QB

    3 - Lawrence Taylor - LB

    2 - Jim Brown -RB

    1 - Jerry Rice - WR
     
    fishfanmiami likes this.
  12. Mach2

    Mach2 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2018
    Messages:
    199
    Likes Received:
    206
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Manning slipped my mind. I guess because of his collapse in the big games (much like Elway, and Kelly).

    I don't know if Johnny U would be successful today.

    I guess the other poster was right, in that Championships matter a lot.

    Favre? Don't buy it at all. He was a stud, and wasn't afraid to sling it, but not even in my top 15. A guy like Kurt Warner was better.
     
  13. Dmarino110

    Dmarino110 Starter

    Joined:
    Apr 2005
    Messages:
    2,175
    Likes Received:
    30
    Trophy Points:
    48
    They changed the rules to make QBs better now...it took 20 years for another qb to pass for 5k and he did it when they rarely went over 3k.

    He is by far the best qb ever and if he played in these rules he would put up 6k a year
     
    royalshank and Mach2 like this.
  14. Miami 13

    Miami 13 Pro Bowler

    Joined:
    Aug 2004
    Messages:
    5,801
    Likes Received:
    519
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Marino in the 2000’s-2010’s era would of have 60+ TD’s yearly and 6k passing like it was nothing.
     
    Viggen and royalshank like this.
  15. royalshank

    royalshank Not a Game-Changer Finheaven VIP Donator

    Joined:
    Mar 2006
    Messages:
    8,762
    Likes Received:
    1,887
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Jerry Rice over Jim Brown? No.
     
    crumpdaddy and NorthernFin like this.
  16. Digital

    Digital Starter Finheaven VIP

    Joined:
    Feb 2008
    Messages:
    6,219
    Likes Received:
    2,548
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Thank you for that DKphin. He was my all-time hero. Dan Marino kept us permanently in awe. Towards the end if you watch those throws when they're talking about how he owned all the passing records when he retired … look at how he throws just barely past the DB's outstretched hand, or the next throw where he waits, glides to the outside edge of the pocket to barely avoid the reaching arm of a DL, and throws an instant-dart to the receiver just inches past the DB as soon as that tiny throwing window opens. And he makes all of them look effortless … routine.

    But when you ignore the QB and instead watch only the defenders (DL and DB) and the WR, you realize just how perfect those throws needed to be for those plays to ever have a chance. It's not like today when the windows are huge because DB's can't touch WR's after 5 yards. Those DB's had their hands on the WR's the entire time, and those windows were tiny and closed very quickly. Marino just effortlessly avoided the rush, found the throwing lane, and used a nailgun to insta-deliver the ball into the tiniest of windows. Such a joy to watch.
     
  17. Mach2

    Mach2 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2018
    Messages:
    199
    Likes Received:
    206
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Come on. At that point in the discussion, you're splitting hairs over two different positions in two different eras. You can't go wrong with either, and they would both be stars today.

    Respect the conviction of your opinion though.
     
  18. Highzenga

    Highzenga Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2012
    Messages:
    904
    Likes Received:
    249
    Trophy Points:
    43
    I have 1) Brady 2) Manning 3) Montana 4) Marino 5) Elway as greatest qbs ever based on the overall body of work. However, Brady & Montana were system qbs to an extent and I don’t believe they would be hall of famers if they played on any other team. Marino on the other hand, would dominate on any team and in any era. He’s a top ten player of all time. That list is a bit ridiculous.
     
    RVAPhinFan13 likes this.
  19. Longshot

    Longshot FinHeaven VIP Finheaven VIP Donator

    Joined:
    Mar 2008
    Messages:
    184
    Likes Received:
    19
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Dan Marino made every Dolphins game both watchable and winnable. Peyton is the only other QB that I have ever seen in the same class, where you could be down by 14-17 in the 4th but still feel like you were in it.

    Dan rewrote the passing records. He had records that stood for decades and that only rule changes allowed to be broken. The guy was an all-time uber stud. But then, I think Barry Sanders was better than Jim Brown or Emmit Smith, so what do I know. If there were games that were worth watching, regardless of if you had skin in the game or not, Dan and Barry were pure entertainment and raw talent.
     
    Viggen and Highzenga like this.
  20. Mach2

    Mach2 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2018
    Messages:
    199
    Likes Received:
    206
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Dan was definitely the guy you wanted if you needed a score late in the fourth.

    I agree, also about Barry. If he hadn't retired young, or had played for an actual NFL franchise, his numbers would be untouchable.

    I'm allowed to say that having grown up in Michigan, and experiencing decades of disappointment and incompetence.
     
  21. Vaark

    Vaark Nihil taurus crappus Finheaven VIP Donator

    Joined:
    Apr 2007
    Messages:
    25,161
    Likes Received:
    3,266
    Trophy Points:
    113
    There are a bunch of subjectively higher rated player about whom you can raise a credible counter-argument. (ditto a fewflower ranked ones that might in some eyes be rated possibly higher) However the one I take particular issue with is Favre who purposely hung in long enough just to break a few of Marino's records solely by dint of longevity! Fortunately he also broke a negative record to distinguish himself as The All Time King Of Turnovers
     
  22. dfinz77

    dfinz77 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2011
    Messages:
    100
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Marino on a Monday night in the 80's and 90's was must see tv
     
    Highzenga, Goin` Deep and royalshank like this.
  23. royalshank

    royalshank Not a Game-Changer Finheaven VIP Donator

    Joined:
    Mar 2006
    Messages:
    8,762
    Likes Received:
    1,887
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I think the entire thing is too difficult to compare different positions and accross eras. That said, Jim Brown was the Babe Ruth of football. He was so dominant that it almost wasn’t fair. He led the league in rushing 8 of 9 years he played and was an 8 time all pro. His yards per carry are still tops all time and at his size and strength no one wanted to tackle him. Jerry Rice was not a more dominant player at his position than Brown was at his, period. Rice was great. Everyone on that list was great. There was Jim Brown and then 99 other great players. I can’t believe anyone ranked ahead of him on any “best” list.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Brown

    Again, I suggest he was so good it almost wasn’t fair.
     
  24. raving

    raving Starter

    Joined:
    May 2004
    Messages:
    1,394
    Likes Received:
    154
    Trophy Points:
    63
    This numbering thing is plain stupid.

    If I were to list start to assemble any team from any era -I would start w the most important position QB - I would choose Marino in his prime 100 times out of 100.

    The rest of the team could be named from there.

    No QB is close - it’s OK for people to get mixed up about that - it’s really hard to inderstand how great a QB Marino was.

    His talents were sublime.

    His competitive spirit was 2nd to none.

    His shattered every QB record in existence in an era when the rules were so against him doing so.

    The idea that he would be named 25 is stupid and an insult!
     
  25. Goin` Deep

    Goin` Deep "Pick your guy...and let it fly." Finheaven VIP Donator

    Joined:
    May 2004
    Messages:
    3,517
    Likes Received:
    825
    Trophy Points:
    113

    But, he never won a Super Bowl and that's why he's #25.
     
  26. royalshank

    royalshank Not a Game-Changer Finheaven VIP Donator

    Joined:
    Mar 2006
    Messages:
    8,762
    Likes Received:
    1,887
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Barry was the 2nd best RB of all time after Jim Brown. Barry was better than Emmit Smith by a wide margin. Smith enjoyed a great OL while Barry and penetration in the backfield on every touch. I remember a nationally televised game between Dallas and Detroit where Sanders went off. Smith had a good game but the difference between the “greatness-Ism” of the two was massive.

    Jim Brown was in a whole other league. When you have a guy that no one wants to tackle who delivered far more punishment than he took it’s almost not fair. He was a giant man among little boys. Best football player ever.
     
  27. royalshank

    royalshank Not a Game-Changer Finheaven VIP Donator

    Joined:
    Mar 2006
    Messages:
    8,762
    Likes Received:
    1,887
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Unfortunate how much stock is put into this in sports. I remember Elway having the same monicker until Terrel Davis helped him win at the end. Elway that lost 3 SBs was far better than the old man that didn’t have to do much and won 2. His stat line vs Pack is attrocious - as bad as Peyton was against Carolina. Again, the guy got 2 rings but played horribly in one game (he was so injured it was pathetic) and pretty sub-average against the Bears. Lucky for him he got to go against Rex Grossman. And the real MVP of that game was the kicker as Peyton just couldn’t put the game away in the 2nd half having to settle for a million FGs. The Peyton that lost the SB was NO was the better QB, carrying a poor team to the big game. Point is, we all know it’s a team game and sometimes the greats might be the reason you are in the conversation but it’s never ever enough to steal the world championship. There has never been a SB “stolen” by a QB overcoming the thorough outplaying by the other team as these greats often can do (Marino made a living doing this) in the regular season and even playoffs (see Marino vs ‘85 Browns and ‘90 Chiefs).
     
    fishfanmiami and Highzenga like this.
  28. Highzenga

    Highzenga Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2012
    Messages:
    904
    Likes Received:
    249
    Trophy Points:
    43
    I agree that you can’t put too much stock in rings in the NFL. While Marino is the best I’ve ever saw, it’s difficult to put him ahead of Brady, Manning & Montana because they have all the individual accolades as well as team success. Brady and Montana played for dynasties. Manning played for a bad organization for most of his career and carried them to two Super Bowls winning one then another with a loaded Denver team. Unfortunately, Marino never played for a stacked team.
     
    royalshank likes this.
  29. EJay

    EJay Scout Team

    Joined:
    Aug 2004
    Messages:
    524
    Likes Received:
    51
    Trophy Points:
    28
    IMO, most people rank players based off team success -- which the completely wrong way to do it. If you're ranking greatest "teams" of all time, sure. But many of the greatest players of all time played on inferior teams.

    In the case of Marino, he played on an average to slightly above average (at times) franchise with a HOF coach that was a bit passed his prime yet #13 still managed to elevate them.

    IMO, if Marino was swapped with Montana during the 49ers glory days -- he'd also have been part of multiple SB titles and maybe even more than the 4 they got with Joe Cool. Sames goes with the Patriots. Swap Marino for Brady and they still win at an equal or better clip. People forget how defense and special team heavy New England was the first 4-5 years of Brady's career. Marino was elite right off the bat and would have made those early Patriots championship teams far more deadly.

    People often underestimate Marino despite it being pretty much impossible to overcome the lack of defense and special teams. And an o-line that is balanced enough to be able to run the ball effectively. Shula and the front office of the time made big mistakes putting together a one-dimensional offensive line and failing to find a RB whose running style could compensate. And the defense/ST's was almost always a joke. Only a couple times during Marino's career were they passable.

    It's pretty much impossible to win a SB when your defense surrenders 40+ in a Conference title game and 38 in a SB. Just ask Tom Brady who's team lost last year despite putting 33 on the scoreboard.
     
    Highzenga and royalshank like this.
  30. royalshank

    royalshank Not a Game-Changer Finheaven VIP Donator

    Joined:
    Mar 2006
    Messages:
    8,762
    Likes Received:
    1,887
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The SB against the Niners was ridiculous - roger Craig, Wendell Tyler and Montana gashed us w the short passes to the flats because our LBs were just too slow to get out there and cover. When they would cheat and run to the spot, Montana would pull it down and run up the middle for 5-7 yards. Did it a bunch. Just couldn’t get them off of the field.
     
  31. Highzenga

    Highzenga Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2012
    Messages:
    904
    Likes Received:
    249
    Trophy Points:
    43
    I 100% agree with putting Marino on the NE/SF they would’ve definitely had even more success. Marino WAS the system. In fact, the only player I would put close to Marino as far as best qb talent wise is Rodgers. You make good points
     
    EJay likes this.
  32. Ju1cy_St3ak_route

    Ju1cy_St3ak_route Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2017
    Messages:
    36
    Likes Received:
    26
    Trophy Points:
    18
    I feel u but no, Marino is still the best ever. Then without a doubt followed by Joe, Rodgers, Elway & Brady. Give Marino 4 chances at a Super Bowl..... **** look at Elway & Jim Kelly... Marino is the best I've ever seen is all I can say. The GOAT
     
  33. Teenwolf

    Teenwolf You are an animal

    Joined:
    Jul 2005
    Messages:
    275
    Likes Received:
    71
    Trophy Points:
    28
    When I watch Rogers, I get the same feelings I had when watching Marino.

    I don't buy the whole 'Marino never had any good teams to play on' argument. I watch a ton of old games on Youtube and what I notice is how good some of our teams were, especially compared to the junk we have today.

    Let's face it, the 49ers dominated the 80's with some of the best teams ever seen, the Bills dominated the early half of the 90's with fantastic teams, and then Dallas came along. Marino played on some really good teams, but unfortunately others were better.

    I would certainly have him higher up on the list, but as time goes by, quarterbacks are getting better, in part due to the rules, but also because the position & plays evolve.

    I think Drew Brees should get a mention too, heck of a player and so consistent!
     
  34. TedSlimmJr

    TedSlimmJr Hartselle Tigers (15-0) 5-A State Champ

    Joined:
    Jul 2008
    Messages:
    10,172
    Likes Received:
    1,019
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I certainly couldn't point to 24 better players than Marino. The quarterbacks ranked ahead of him would be sitting on the bench watching if they played on the same team as Marino.

    Although Favre is one of my all time favorites. One of the toughest to ever play the game....regardless of position.

    Dan Marino is a top 10 all time player in my opinion. None of these quarterbacks nowdays are playing the same game he played, and they're not doing what he did.
     
  35. royalshank

    royalshank Not a Game-Changer Finheaven VIP Donator

    Joined:
    Mar 2006
    Messages:
    8,762
    Likes Received:
    1,887
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You are right about the dynasties of the ‘80s and ‘90s including the Skins. The NFC won every SN from ‘84-‘96 w more physical, power football. But, the Miami teams were not that good. The defense was always bad - the constant? Longest tenured D coordinarle during his time even though his D almost always was bottom of the league. Miami has a few very good teams after ‘84 but not a SB worthy one. Even w Dan.
     
    Teenwolf likes this.
  36. SkapePhin

    SkapePhin Rump Shaker Finheaven VIP Donator

    Joined:
    May 2002
    Messages:
    33,400
    Likes Received:
    4,899
    Trophy Points:
    113
    At the end of the clip Alex Rodriguez says he hasn't watched another Dolphin game since Marino retired...

    Fair weather *******!
     
    royalshank likes this.
  37. Adam Strange

    Adam Strange Question Authority Finheaven VIP

    Joined:
    Apr 2008
    Messages:
    1,262
    Likes Received:
    360
    Trophy Points:
    83
    The ‘85 team was Super Bowl worthy; they just had an awful game at the worst time (not that they were a lock to win the SB had they gotten there, but they certainly were good enough to get there). The early ‘90s teams— specifically ‘90, 92, and ‘94— were good enough to win the conference, but they came up short in the playoffs and never had the answer for Buffalo in the post-season.
     
  38. royalshank

    royalshank Not a Game-Changer Finheaven VIP Donator

    Joined:
    Mar 2006
    Messages:
    8,762
    Likes Received:
    1,887
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I feel you though the ‘85 team’s defense wasn’t good enough IMO. They got trampled by NEs run game in the AFC title game. The 90’s teams were good but not as good as the Bills who were a dynasty and loaded w great players up and down. Miami was 2nd best to them - but not good enough to beat them on a consistent basis. Ironically, the ‘93 season may have been the exception. We had beaten them pretty bad in their stadium, were 3-1 or 4-1 when Dan ruptured the Achilles and I feel we may have finally overtaken them for the conference but it just wasn’t meant to be.
     
  39. Teenwolf

    Teenwolf You are an animal

    Joined:
    Jul 2005
    Messages:
    275
    Likes Received:
    71
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Agreed, 93 was the year it was meant to happen. We've had some rotten luck over the last 30 years
     
  40. Adam Strange

    Adam Strange Question Authority Finheaven VIP

    Joined:
    Apr 2008
    Messages:
    1,262
    Likes Received:
    360
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Eh, I don’t think there was anything special about ‘93. In ‘92 we whipped Buffalo up there early in the season. Then they won both subsequent games in Miami, including the AFC championship. So I don’t put much stock in an early season win at Buffalo as indicative that the Dolphins had found a way to vanquish the Bills. That ‘93 Bills team was still good enough to win the conference

    The real shame is the fact that the team lost in the divisional round of the ‘94 playoffs since they wouldn’t have had to deal with Buffalo at all en route to the Super Bowl.
     

Share This Page