#3 pick | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

#3 pick

Who to draft?


  • Total voters
    236
We may not have a trade partner.
Tough call.

I think we can find a trade partner. It just depends on what we can get. Without specifics, its impossible to judge the relative value.

If "forced" to pick at #3, I probably take Sewell, but throw him, Fields and Parsons in a hat, and draw a name. It's an overdraft either way.

Parsons would be the best fit for our defensive needs if he plays to his potential, but Sewell is the safer pick, IMO. Also not against doubling down on QBs.

None of those are my preference though. We might just have to swallow a trade down for less than a king's ransome, as distasteful as that may be.
 
I'm not against picking Smith or Chase right here. If they thing Sewell is all world I could live with the pick. Just go offense no matter what, that's where the gaping holes are.
 
As mentioned by Mach 2, I think we will have offers for #3, but the question is whether or not the offers provide value for Miami. If they stay, we won't know who they'll pick until the draft because they've been keeping everything close to the vest. My preference would be to trade down if we can get good value, but we'll never know what the offers are or how much Miami values the talent available with pick #3. Speculating is all we can do at this time.
 
If we don't have a trade partner then it really comes down to what happens in FA, if we get a good OL in FA then draft a receiver (Smith) if we get a good receiver then perhaps best to go with Sewell to beef up the line. I think those are the main areas to address at this point.
 
Trading down is the best option. Im sure we will have plenty of offers while also staying in the top 10. Detroit might have Goff, but they may still want to move up to 3 and have enough picks to beat out any other offers. But if we stay at 3 I say P.Sewell.
 
Trading out would be first option....if can't - Sewell, if he's not there than Parsons.
 
Getting an anchor on the offensive line or a play making receiver is a type of screwing that many pay top dollar for.
Of course, but in other years, having that pick gets you RGIII, Jared Goff, Carson Wentz kind of trade-down packages.

That is what I want for us with this pick, for once.
 
Like most others I want to trade down but again we need a partner. We really need somebody to come up for 1 of the QBs but if we’re absolutely forced to pick at #3 then Sewell has to be the pick. Just to much value to pass on not to mention he’s probably the safest pick in the draft.

I agree we need WRs and we need an elite guy but #3 is just to high for a WR. The expectations would be through the roof and their would be so much pressure on whichever WR it was that it would be almost impossible to live up to the hype. If we take a WR at #3 he’s got to produce 90 catch 1300/1400 yards 10-12 TDs type of seasons or he’ll be considered an overdraft or bust. Just to much pressure on a WR at #3.
 
Depends on what they do in FA. They need at least two WRs. If they can sign one in FA then the news may not be as. If with pick 3. I lean towards Smith or Chase. We all know they are desperate for playmakers.
 
Back
Top Bottom