#3 who ya got
- Thread starter Kebo
- Start date
For me it's probably between Sewell and Smith. Push comes to shove I probably take Sewell and look for an opportunity to trade up for Smith. I wouldn't be upset with Parsons or Chase either, I just have slight personal preferences for Sewell and Smith. Fields isn't a consideration.
jimthefin
Club Member
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2004
- Messages
- 6,396
- Reaction score
- 12,416
It has to be Sewell.
Best non QB in the Draft.
Tua needs weapons but building an OL to protect him and improve the running game is helping Tua as well.
There will be WR's on the board for Miami's 2nd first rounder or with a slight trade up.
LB would just have to wait.
But the Offense is more important.
Best non QB in the Draft.
Tua needs weapons but building an OL to protect him and improve the running game is helping Tua as well.
There will be WR's on the board for Miami's 2nd first rounder or with a slight trade up.
LB would just have to wait.
But the Offense is more important.
100%
I said this in another thread. If we traded up for Smith after getting Sewell I would be quite happy. But I dont think he will be there.
Finsup4ever
Active Roster
No trade option?
Give me Sewell
Give me Sewell
If trade down is not an option I guess it’s got to be Sewell. I say that as if it’s bad thing but it’s obviously not. But I just don’t like the idea of moving Sewell OR Jackson to Right Tackle.
With that said I think my number one option is, and I know you said no trade downs but this is realistic, is to trade down to 5 or 6 and take Parsons AND then grab that teams second round pick. 2nd option is trade down to 10ish grab Devonta Smith/Jamarr Chase and pick up that teams second and then their first next year. No team behind us this year has 2 firsts.
With that said I think my number one option is, and I know you said no trade downs but this is realistic, is to trade down to 5 or 6 and take Parsons AND then grab that teams second round pick. 2nd option is trade down to 10ish grab Devonta Smith/Jamarr Chase and pick up that teams second and then their first next year. No team behind us this year has 2 firsts.
- Joined
- May 27, 2005
- Messages
- 25,610
- Reaction score
- 35,913
Without a trade down option, Sewell for me.
Smith.
Even if the gap between Sewell and the OT you can get at 1b is bigger than the gap between Smith and the WR you can get at 1b (a point I'm not ready to concede), the impact will be smaller. Because a high-end WR is immensely valuable, and any good OT is very valuable.
Smith + Darrisaw > Sewell + Bateman
Even if the gap between Sewell and the OT you can get at 1b is bigger than the gap between Smith and the WR you can get at 1b (a point I'm not ready to concede), the impact will be smaller. Because a high-end WR is immensely valuable, and any good OT is very valuable.
Smith + Darrisaw > Sewell + Bateman
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2003
- Messages
- 16,439
- Reaction score
- 44,134
I could not disagree any more...
Finsup4ever
Active Roster
I actually used this exact concept in one of those mock simulator drafts today. I traded back from 3, but did draft Smith with the first pick. I took Leatherwood in the 2nd round. I felt that moving him over to RT would make him very effective, and kick Hunt down to RG.
- Joined
- May 27, 2005
- Messages
- 25,610
- Reaction score
- 35,913
I can see that. Smith would be an exciting addition.
If Miami ends up at #3, though, I'm expecting a trade down. If the Dolphins can move down, get more picks and Smith...ultimate win.
Durango2020
Active Roster
If the Jets picked Fields and no trade option then it would be Sewell. If Jets get Fields then Parsons, however i think if at #3 Fields is available we would have great opportunity to trade down and get a top receiver as well as additional picks.
