4th and 9 and the Time Out call.... | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

4th and 9 and the Time Out call....

phins_4_ever

E12 FH Tailgate Gang
Joined
Jan 9, 2002
Messages
30,853
Reaction score
13,007
Location
S Florida/Dolphins Nation
I am one who says that the time out call on 4th and 9 was the right call. A lot of people around me agreed with that. But to understand the call and realize that there are times to throw out the book and do what is right in that very moment we have to look at the bigger picture rather than the 4th and 9 as an individual play.

Roll back
The deeper reason reason for that call lies essentially in our first half. Heat and humidity is supposed to be our advantage but the fact that our D was on the field for 20 minutes out of 30 in the first half negated that advantage and put us into the disadvantage.
At half time there were plenty of discussions amongst us and the consensus was that if the game is close the first half will come back to haunt our defense.

Roll Forward
If you want to talk about taking time outs with a 20/20 hindsight we also have to question the time out before we punted on 4th and 8. The majority of coaches does that but in hindsight it would not have mattered if we punted at 2:15 with the time out or 2:17 or 2:16 without the time out. But that extra time out might have done wonders for our defense when they needed it most.

When our offense failed to keep possession and our D had to trot back out on the field after what was a lousy two minute possession by us. You literally could see them being exhausted. In the first half and most of the second half they were hoping and bouncing around and getting the crowd going. But when they came back out on the field it was more like a beaten unit.
The consensus was pretty much that they are finished. Just before the 3rd and 9 we all felt that this is the down which would make or break us. Our D was slow in getting up. Slow lining up. Couple of fans screamed out what I was thinking "Take a time out now" and couple others said that if we don't get a turnover here we are done. I think from a physical stand point this was the down where they gave their last they had. It almost worked. If any of you would have seen them struggle to line up after that play you'd be changing your mind. They were done. Finished. Kaput. We all were screaming for a time out at that point.

Under normal circumstances I agree. Don't call a time out when you have the momentum on your side. But to be honest what we may call momentum on 3rd and 9 was probably more the last energy coming out in a burst. There was nothing left after that. In hindsight I rather would have spend a time out on 3rd and 9 and if necessary on a possible 4th down play.

For an Aaron Rodgers it didn't matter if there was a time out or not. He plays his game regardless. The only thing stopping him is a defense. But when you have a defense which is physical exhausted you have a defense which makes a lot of mental mistakes. It is no surprise that the remainder of that possession was almost the easiest one for Rodgers and the Packers O.

The time out on 4th down was not a time out by the books. It was a time out call on a strictly human level trying to give your D a rest. Unfortunately it didn't work.

On my way back from the stadium someone on the radio suggested that it was taken because we had the wrong personnel on the field. NO. We did not substitute anybody. This TO was a TO to avoid the inevitable because for most of us the 3rd an 9 was the play we finally lost. Can you just feel the irony? We stop an opponent on 3rd and 9, cause a fumble and almost recover it yet it is the one play we could have won the game.

So if you look for an explanation for that time out you have to look at the game as a whole. It really makes sense when people say that winning the time of possession is important especially in close games. On Sunday it turned our advantage into a disadvantage.
 
If you do it you better win.

If you don't win - in my book your out looking for a job.

It was an idiotic call...

The clock - the down and distance all of it was a nightmare for THEM!

Make them make the play....

That's why Philbin ran on first - got sacked on second - ran on third and punted....

IF you have guts then they never should have gotten the ball back...

You take a timeout when we have the ball and you tell your offense they have 4 run plays to get 10 yards or heads roll...

There's your timeout...

Short of that...If your cute timeout when they have the ball does not WIN you the game you are an idiot!

Philbin is an idiot!


I am one who says that the time out call on 4th and 9 was the right call. A lot of people around me agreed with that. But to understand the call and realize that there are times to throw out the book and do what is right in that very moment we have to look at the bigger picture rather than the 4th and 9 as an individual play.

Roll back
The deeper reason reason for that call lies essentially in our first half. Heat and humidity is supposed to be our advantage but the fact that our D was on the field for 20 minutes out of 30 in the first half negated that advantage and put us into the disadvantage.
At half time there were plenty of discussions amongst us and the consensus was that if the game is close the first half will come back to haunt our defense.

Roll Forward
If you want to talk about taking time outs with a 20/20 hindsight we also have to question the time out before we punted on 4th and 8. The majority of coaches does that but in hindsight it would not have mattered if we punted at 2:15 with the time out or 2:17 or 2:16 without the time out. But that extra time out might have done wonders for our defense when they needed it most.

When our offense failed to keep possession and our D had to trot back out on the field after what was a lousy two minute possession by us. You literally could see them being exhausted. In the first half and most of the second half they were hoping and bouncing around and getting the crowd going. But when they came back out on the field it was more like a beaten unit.
The consensus was pretty much that they are finished. Just before the 3rd and 9 we all felt that this is the down which would make or break us. Our D was slow in getting up. Slow lining up. Couple of fans screamed out what I was thinking "Take a time out now" and couple others said that if we don't get a turnover here we are done. I think from a physical stand point this was the down where they gave their last they had. It almost worked. If any of you would have seen them struggle to line up after that play you'd be changing your mind. They were done. Finished. Kaput. We all were screaming for a time out at that point.

Under normal circumstances I agree. Don't call a time out when you have the momentum on your side. But to be honest what we may call momentum on 3rd and 9 was probably more the last energy coming out in a burst. There was nothing left after that. In hindsight I rather would have spend a time out on 3rd and 9 and if necessary on a possible 4th down play.

For an Aaron Rodgers it didn't matter if there was a time out or not. He plays his game regardless. The only thing stopping him is a defense. But when you have a defense which is physical exhausted you have a defense which makes a lot of mental mistakes. It is no surprise that the remainder of that possession was almost the easiest one for Rodgers and the Packers O.

The time out on 4th down was not a time out by the books. It was a time out call on a strictly human level trying to give your D a rest. Unfortunately it didn't work.

On my way back from the stadium someone on the radio suggested that it was taken because we had the wrong personnel on the field. NO. We did not substitute anybody. This TO was a TO to avoid the inevitable because for most of us the 3rd an 9 was the play we finally lost. Can you just feel the irony? We stop an opponent on 3rd and 9, cause a fumble and almost recover it yet it is the one play we could have won the game.

So if you look for an explanation for that time out you have to look at the game as a whole. It really makes sense when people say that winning the time of possession is important especially in close games. On Sunday it turned our advantage into a disadvantage.
 
I agree with this thread & if I'm not mistaken the camera caught Wake calling the TO & he looked exhausted & he is probably the best conditioned player we have. Look I HATE that we lost but IMO you can't pin it on that TO. If you are going to blame the D then make a stop on 4th & 9 period with or without the TO. Look if we stop them great TO since we didn't horrible call. I'm more upset with Finnegan a veteran that blew it on the fake spike WHY are you 10 yards off of him & why push him out?????
 
If you do it you better win.

If you don't win - in my book your out looking for a job.

It was an idiotic call...

The clock - the down and distance all of it was a nightmare for THEM!

Make them make the play....

That's why Philbin ran on first - got sacked on second - ran on third and punted....

IF you have guts then they never should have gotten the ball back...

You take a timeout when we have the ball and you tell your offense they have 4 run plays to get 10 yards or heads roll...

There's your timeout...

Short of that...If your cute timeout when they have the ball does not WIN you the game you are an idiot!

Philbin is an idiot!

I do agree with you on our possession. We should be able to keep the ball with a lousy 4 minutes left or at least get enough first downs to make them take the time outs and worse case scenario we punt with a 15 seconds left. Though we should be able to just run the clock out.

I still don't know what the problem is. Do we have players we don't trust? Is it our OC? Philbin? I can not envision that if we have the player we trust incl a franchise QB that we would hold them back on purpose and give Rodgers a chance with two minutes left. Philbin was in Green Bay. He knows what Rodgers is capable of. Lazor is not a moron either.

And I do agree with you as well that if you take the time out it better work. If it doesn't the second guessing will always continue. It works they are the heroes. It doesn't they are the goats.

Rodgers is Rodgers. He definitely would have converted that 4th down anyways. Our defense was so gassed out that if I probably would have taken two time outs before the 4th and 9. :lol:
 
Yeah they gained 1 yard on 3 plays to get to 4th down, they were obviously gaining strenght and momentum...
 
I am one who says that the time out call on 4th and 9 was the right call. A lot of people around me agreed with that. But to understand the call and realize that there are times to throw out the book and do what is right in that very moment we have to look at the bigger picture rather than the 4th and 9 as an individual play.

Roll back
The deeper reason reason for that call lies essentially in our first half. Heat and humidity is supposed to be our advantage but the fact that our D was on the field for 20 minutes out of 30 in the first half negated that advantage and put us into the disadvantage.
At half time there were plenty of discussions amongst us and the consensus was that if the game is close the first half will come back to haunt our defense.

Roll Forward
If you want to talk about taking time outs with a 20/20 hindsight we also have to question the time out before we punted on 4th and 8. The majority of coaches does that but in hindsight it would not have mattered if we punted at 2:15 with the time out or 2:17 or 2:16 without the time out. But that extra time out might have done wonders for our defense when they needed it most.

When our offense failed to keep possession and our D had to trot back out on the field after what was a lousy two minute possession by us. You literally could see them being exhausted. In the first half and most of the second half they were hoping and bouncing around and getting the crowd going. But when they came back out on the field it was more like a beaten unit.
The consensus was pretty much that they are finished. Just before the 3rd and 9 we all felt that this is the down which would make or break us. Our D was slow in getting up. Slow lining up. Couple of fans screamed out what I was thinking "Take a time out now" and couple others said that if we don't get a turnover here we are done. I think from a physical stand point this was the down where they gave their last they had. It almost worked. If any of you would have seen them struggle to line up after that play you'd be changing your mind. They were done. Finished. Kaput. We all were screaming for a time out at that point.

Under normal circumstances I agree. Don't call a time out when you have the momentum on your side. But to be honest what we may call momentum on 3rd and 9 was probably more the last energy coming out in a burst. There was nothing left after that. In hindsight I rather would have spend a time out on 3rd and 9 and if necessary on a possible 4th down play.

For an Aaron Rodgers it didn't matter if there was a time out or not. He plays his game regardless. The only thing stopping him is a defense. But when you have a defense which is physical exhausted you have a defense which makes a lot of mental mistakes. It is no surprise that the remainder of that possession was almost the easiest one for Rodgers and the Packers O.

The time out on 4th down was not a time out by the books. It was a time out call on a strictly human level trying to give your D a rest. Unfortunately it didn't work.

On my way back from the stadium someone on the radio suggested that it was taken because we had the wrong personnel on the field. NO. We did not substitute anybody. This TO was a TO to avoid the inevitable because for most of us the 3rd an 9 was the play we finally lost. Can you just feel the irony? We stop an opponent on 3rd and 9, cause a fumble and almost recover it yet it is the one play we could have won the game.

So if you look for an explanation for that time out you have to look at the game as a whole. It really makes sense when people say that winning the time of possession is important especially in close games. On Sunday it turned our advantage into a disadvantage.

What? So.... You're saying that giving an elite QB extra 2nd half timeouts is a good call? Even though Phailbin himself admitted today that it was a bad call? Even though former coaches nationally have said it was a horrible use of a timeout? I just want to make sure I have that straight.
 
You know this is something Bill Belechick does all the time but you know what the difference is? He calls a hell of a defense when he does. I remember a game vs Atlanta last year where he did it just before the last play of the game. The result, 3 players jammed Gonzalez, the pass rush was quick and his best CB (Aquib Talib) was one on one with a gimpy Roddy White. Ryan tries to force it to White, incomplete Patriots win.

The difference is Belechick doesn't come back form the TO with Phillip Wheeler on a TE or 5-8 180 LB Brent Grimes man to man with Jordy Nelson.
 
What? So.... You're saying that giving an elite QB extra 2nd half timeouts is a good call? Even though Phailbin himself admitted today that it was a bad call? Even though former coaches nationally have said it was a horrible use of a timeout? I just want to make sure I have that straight.

Before you start spouting crap:

Philbin was asked about the timeout with 6 seconds left and he would not do it again.
McCarthy (coach of the Packers) thought it was a smart decision. Not something you would prefer but a smart decision under those circumstances.
 
I dont get the big deal with that call, Defence got rest and rushed Rogers out of the pocket and into a scramble, DB's had great coverage until Grimes slipped. If Grimes hadnt lost his footing everyone who is calling it a bonehead call would be saying it was genius and that they would have dont the same.

I bet if there was no timeout and the defenced got torched cause they were gassed everyone he would say they should have called a timeout because the D was tired.

The worst play was the 3nd and 4rd down calls on the previous serious. Why throw on second down if your gonna try and kill the clock on 3rd. Either kill it both plays or go for it on both. Lazor should have just run the ball and GB wouldn't have had near enough time to run their drive to get that TD.
 
I dont get the big deal with that call, Defence got rest and rushed Rogers out of the pocket and into a scramble, DB's had great coverage until Grimes slipped. If Grimes hadnt lost his footing everyone who is calling it a bonehead call would be saying it was genius and that they would have dont the same.

I bet if there was no timeout and the defenced got torched cause they were gassed everyone he would say they should have called a timeout because the D was tired.

The worst play was the 3nd and 4rd down calls on the previous serious. Why throw on second down if your gonna try and kill the clock on 3rd. Either kill it both plays or go for it on both. Lazor should have just run the ball and GB wouldn't have had near enough time to run their drive to get that TD.


I think coming up empty after a blocked Punt was the biggest blunder in the game.
 
You know this is something Bill Belechick does all the time but you know what the difference is? He calls a hell of a defense when he does. I remember a game vs Atlanta last year where he did it just before the last play of the game. The result, 3 players jammed Gonzalez, the pass rush was quick and his best CB (Aquib Talib) was one on one with a gimpy Roddy White. Ryan tries to force it to White, incomplete Patriots win.

The difference is Belechick doesn't come back form the TO with Phillip Wheeler on a TE or 5-8 180 LB Brent Grimes man to man with Jordy Nelson.

Why are we talking about Wheeler? He wasn't involved in this play.
 
Why are we talking about Wheeler? He wasn't involved in this play.

Yeah I'm sort of talking about both timeouts, many fans are complaining about both of them. BB does it all the time though, lets the offense get lined up, calls timeout and puts a great defense for that play on the field. That was my larger point. That Atlanta play stuck out to me because it was such a great defensive call and makes the point that you can call a great defense after that timeout, not isolate Phillip Wheeler in coverage.
 
Ultimately, this game came down to Aaron Rodgers, arguably the best QB in the game today, and Joe Philbin, with all 3 his timeouts in tact...just like everybody knew, and hoped, it would. One of the all time great battle of the titans for my money.

You got us this time Aaron, but if we meet again in the SuperBowl our timeouts usage will make your head spin!!
 
I agree with this thread & if I'm not mistaken the camera caught Wake calling the TO & he looked exhausted & he is probably the best conditioned player we have. Look I HATE that we lost but IMO you can't pin it on that TO. If you are going to blame the D then make a stop on 4th & 9 period with or without the TO. Look if we stop them great TO since we didn't horrible call. I'm more upset with Finnegan a veteran that blew it on the fake spike WHY are you 10 yards off of him & why push him out?????

I came home and deleted the game from the DVR, but I'd be very interested to know if this was the actual case. I only question it because I read another poster claim that Wake looked at the sideline in possible disgust or confusion when it was called.
 
I want a HC who has answers not defenses. why don't we get other teams gassed? why are we the ones to fall for the fake spike? why do our ST's not win just once in a while? why do we have no identity? why do we start slow? this thread has credibility but it doesn't point to superior coaching.

I hope we win for the players sakes
 
Back
Top Bottom