VManis
Starter
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2003
- Messages
- 567
- Reaction score
- 1
http://www.post-gazette.com/sports/columnists/20011021cook1021p1.asp
Its not all rosey but its generally pretty positive.
On another note alot of people have been wondering what kind of offense he perfers. Here is a quote from Mularkey himself on what he wanted to run in Buffalo:
Its not all rosey but its generally pretty positive.
Give Mularkey credit. Eager and enthusiastic about being a coordinator for the first time, he approached the job the right way. He looked for ways to win with Stewart instead of worrying about things the team can't do because of Stewart's inaccuracy as a passer.
On another note alot of people have been wondering what kind of offense he perfers. Here is a quote from Mularkey himself on what he wanted to run in Buffalo:
http://www.buffalobills.com/news/news.jsp?news_id=3536Justin Sawyer (Norcross, GA): On ESPN the commentators presented your desire for the future of the Bills offense as a double tight end, run focused offensive attack. Is this an accurate depiction of your vision for the offense?
Mike Mularkey: No, not solely double-tight end but that's part of it. We use multiple personnel groupings so we're not based on one group. We'd still like to run the ball.