A. Rodgers Stats against..... | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

A. Rodgers Stats against.....

J

joeharley666

☠️ Banned ☠️
Joined
Aug 1, 2007
Messages
2,094
Reaction score
8
Detroit this year

16/27 162 yards 1TD 88 rating

And you guys are roasting THill today??? Just saying

---------- Post added at 06:21 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:19 PM ----------

Oh yeah.....he lost 7-19
 
Yeah. Detroit has a good defense, but so do we. It'd be nice if we had a coach that didn't aid the opposition's offense by stopping the clock for them when they're in a two minute drill.
 
Super Bowl rings: Rodgers: 1 Tannehill: 0. MVP's -- should I keep going?
 
Aaron Rodgers just had a bad day man. He's legend, money, can do no wrong...

People will believe whatever they want to no matter what stats you lay in front of them. It's just the beauty of ignorance...

---------- Post added at 06:26 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:24 PM ----------
AEGBRG said:
Super Bowl rings: Rodgers: 1 Tannehill: 0. MVP's -- should I keep going?
Click to expand...

Really? That's awesome of you to bring up considering that we are talking about a comparison of two QB's performances against the same defense. If anything what you just listed strengthens the argument to show that even SB winning QBs struggle.

Thanks...
 
Also, thanks Joe for picking up on the sarcasm in the part about Aaron Rodgers lol

But seriously Detroit's defense is good, we saw that today. Those who are bashing Tannehill don't want to look at other QBs' performances. It's just easier to point the finger, say he sucks, and blame him for the loss...
 
It just goes to show you that Tannehill isn't the devil. OP makes a great point, if Clay catches that ball we would knight Tanny cause of a w against a top D with a piecemeal line.
 
Krateness said:
Aaron Rodgers just had a bad day man. He's legend, money, can do no wrong...

People will believe whatever they want to no matter what stats you lay in front of them. It's just the beauty of ignorance...
I
---------- Post added at 06:26 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:24 PM ----------



Really? That's awesome of you to bring up considering that we are talking about a comparison of two QB's performances against the same defense. If anything what you just listed strengthens the argument to show that even SB winning QBs struggle.

Thanks...
Click to expand...

Not to mention, his super bowl win came before Tannehill was even in the league
 
I may be missing the posts you are referring to, but I don't remember many blaming Tannehill. He didn't play a great game, but it wasn't terrible overall. The INT was flat out terrible, but he made up for that with some great throws throughout the game. No, if blame has to go to a limited number of people, I would put most of it on Philbin and Pouncey for getting out-thugged by Suh all day.

Side note: no matter how awesome you think Tannehill is, can we please stop trying to compare him to the likes of Rodgers and Manning? It's just as silly as comparing him to Henne.
 
AEGBRG said:
Super Bowl rings: Rodgers: 1 Tannehill: 0. MVP's -- should I keep going?
Click to expand...

Sounds like you're saying that Eli Manning is twice the QB that Rodgers is. Sorry but I just don't buy that one (either) :idk:
 
AEGBRG said:
Super Bowl rings: Rodgers: 1 Tannehill: 0. MVP's -- should I keep going?
Click to expand...

Marino-0 , Eli Manning 2 should I? Not saying Eli is better than Marino just saying Superbowl rings is a team effort and depending on Match ups.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom