A Two Year Plan For MiamI? | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

A Two Year Plan For MiamI?

So Be

Active Roster
Joined
Jul 2, 2006
Messages
16,572
Reaction score
2,216
Maimi needs to question if they have gotten as far as they can with this group and if they need to begin revamping the team, especially on defense where they completely fell apart late last season. Miami has 4 starters on defense over the age of 30 and 10 players in total that were at least 28 last season. That’s essentially half of the team they need to turn over within the next two years and it includes some of their best players in Cameron Wake, Brandon Albert, Brent Grimes, and Randy Starks. Do they make moves to try to extend the window with this group one more time and perhaps sacrifice the future or do they begin a transition strategy?

If the Dolphins opt for the former it could move their upcoming cap situation into one of the worst in the NFL when you consider than Ryan Tannehill will likely end up with a $14-$15 million per year contract in 2016. The only way they can actively upgrade the roster is with big free agent acquisitions and they are only going to be able to do that by pushing more money into 2016 and 2017 with this current group. Given that the team has shown to be little better than a 0.500 team and doesn’t show a dominant trait this would be a highly risky strategy.

Instead they should consider the process of piecing things together for this season while building up cap space for a splash in the future when Tannehill may be more of a finished product. That will likely mean focusing on the draft to fill major needs at corner, linebacker, and the interior line as well as hoping to find a young pass rusher. The organization is now being run by Mike Tannenbaum, who is not afraid of making a splash, and it wouldn’t surprise me if one of those big veterans is moved to build for the future, Wake being the most logical.

My guess is Miami is working hard on identifying possible player cuts and coming up with ways to entice those players on a low cost one or two year contract. Trades for disappointing first and second round picks would also be something that they could be open to. Actual free agency should just pick and choose some younger players with upside that maybe just need a change of scenery.

I would also expect the Dolphins to get a more defined contract strategy in the future. Recently their contracts have been somewhat haphazard, playing hardball with many of their own players and receiving good terms for players like Hartline and Grimes, but signing outlandish deals for players like Wallace, Ellerbe, and Wheeler. That may be an example of Miami picking their battles or simply going all in when they feel that there can be an open competition. Because Miami had no long term contracts in place when they began their spending spree they were also at a possible negotiating disadvantage since it was obvious they had money to spend. By staying tight on the cap they will have a different perception around the NFL and force players to choose the Dolphins sales pitch rather than just the dollar signs.

While this strategy is probably not what people expect from Tannenbaum he did go through something similar to this with the Jets in 2006. Those Jets were in a worse place than the Dolphins but it was a two year plan with a focus on remaining competitive, finding bargains, and preparing for a big free agent frenzy down the line. I see this as a similar job with a transition being needed to bridge the gap from a veteran group to a younger one.

This is a VG article from Jason at Over The Cap who is a Phan.
 
I don't like the term blow it up.....what smart teams do is evaluate whether a player is worth his salary and act accordingly....this team has young players ready to step up and is not that far away.
 
Two year plan and it's a wash...

Hickey/Philbin combo have exactly 1 year to get this team into the playoffs or it's curtains for both of them.

Start by cutting the dead weight and salary cap overloads. (Starks, Finnegan, Wheeler, Ellerbe, Hartline, Gibson, Garner). Open up around $35

Bring back... (Clay, Odrick, Delmas)

FA targets, Plugger DT, CB, OG..... decent players, no need to break the bank but also none of this one-year veteran guys looking for a final pay check.

Draft targets, Playmaker at WR, MLB, (CB/DT) if none at FA.
 
You leave the salary cap up the GM; let him coach.

But he can't buy all the players in the NFL like he can in college. That offense won't work in the NFL anyway.

You guys latch on to the big college names like ESPN hypes up undeserving players. It's pretty funny.

---------- Post added at 01:56 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:55 PM ----------

Two year plan and it's a wash...

Hickey/Philbin combo have exactly 1 year to get this team into the playoffs or it's curtains for both of them.

Start by cutting the dead weight and salary cap overloads. (Starks, Finnegan, Wheeler, Ellerbe, Hartline, Gibson, Garner). Open up around $35

Bring back... (Clay, Odrick, Delmas)

FA targets, Plugger DT, CB, OG..... decent players, no need to break the bank but also none of this one-year veteran guys looking for a final pay check.

Draft targets, Playmaker at WR, MLB, (CB/DT) if none at FA.

You're not going to find a playmaker at MLB in this draft.
 
He makes some VG points. As much as I HATE to, I tend to agree with him in looking to 2016 instead of this year. Take the cap hits now, play younger players, and focus more on next year. TUFF for long suffering Phinatics to do but, it does make sense.
 
But he can't buy all the players in the NFL like he can in college. That offense won't work in the NFL anyway.

You guys latch on to the big college names like ESPN hypes up undeserving players. It's pretty funny.

---------- Post added at 01:56 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:55 PM ----------



You're not going to find a playmaker at MLB in this draft.

Agreed.

Meant Playmaker at WR, a decent MLB and a decent CB.
 
Take the cap hits now, play younger players, and focus more on next year.

While this is what I would want to happen, Philbin (and Hickey) are surely more interested in keeping their jobs. IMO 2015 is a wasted year outside of seeing if RT can improve. Philbin will be gone next year and I would clean house. There is not 1 elite playmaker on this roster to build around and this team has zero identity, personality or excitement.
 
While this is what I would want to happen, Philbin (and Hickey) are surely more interested in keeping their jobs. IMO 2015 is a wasted year outside of seeing if RT can improve. Philbin will be gone next year and I would clean house. There is not 1 elite playmaker on this roster to build around and this team has zero identity, personality or excitement.

I think we can still compete for a playoff spot without spending a lot in FA, and taking the cap hits. The question is if Ross is onboard with this, and maybe looking to next year to make changes with a lot of cap space, and will most Phans support his plan of kinda re-building without saying we are re-building?
 
Two year plan and it's a wash...

Hickey/Philbin combo have exactly 1 year to get this team into the playoffs or it's curtains for both of them.

Start by cutting the dead weight and salary cap overloads. (Starks, Finnegan, Wheeler, Ellerbe, Hartline, Gibson, Garner). Open up around $35

Bring back... (Clay, Odrick, Delmas)

FA targets, Plugger DT, CB, OG..... decent players, no need to break the bank but also none of this one-year veteran guys looking for a final pay check.

Draft targets, Playmaker at WR, MLB, (CB/DT) if none at FA.

I like your plan.

-Bring back those 3 at modest deals (need to draft a rookie or someone though incase Delmas isn't good to go, or goes down again)
-So much dead weight gone gives us a good amount of cash, try to land Franklin as target #1 imo, then knighton/dan williams/someone, then maybe Chris Culliver AND someone else possibly. I like the idea of trying to fill a void at MLB with someone young.. mason foster? or who else? I'm not giving anyone a ellerbe/wheeler type deal here either.

If those things were to unfold (or similar events) It would leave the draft wide open for us. We wouldn't be forced to try to spend a pick on someone just to fill a huge void. Which is one reason I'm not ready to get rid of Wallace yet as well

---------- Post added at 03:14 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:13 PM ----------

Hypothetical question for everyone:

if Clemons or Nolan Carroll were to shake free of their current situations, would you bring them back as depth? I would
 
Back
Top Bottom