A very unique mock

[Stitches]

Let's say for example we sign at least the following players in FA:
1. Lance Briggs - OLB
2. Ken Hamlin / Madieu Williams - S
3. Bryant Johnson - WR

Those are the noteworthy FA's we get, plus 2 or so cbs. One who we know what he is (Jaques Reeves for example) and let's say one question mark (the corner formerly known as Will Peterson).


Then our draft could potentially proceed as follows:
1. Ryan Clady, OT, Boise State
2a. Brandon Albert, OG, Virginia
2b. Red Bryant, DT, Texas A&M
3. Jason Jones, DE, Eastern Michigan
4. Martin Rucker, TE, Missouri
6. Bryan Kehl, LB, BYU
7a. Justin Harper, WR, Virginia Tech
7b. Tyvon Branch, CB, UConn


As if it would ever work out this way.



:unsure:

 

[fishypete]

I think you can forget about Briggs.

 

[The Confessor]

Yeah, no Briggs, and I would take the BEST MLB available at the 2a instead of Albert. Besides that, me likes very very much

 

[Stitches]

Yeah, no Briggs, and I would take the BEST MLB available at the 2a instead of Albert. Besides that, me likes very very much

I agree, if we didn't sign Briggs, and instead signed Randy Thomas for example I'd be looking for Conner or Mayo at 32.

Why could we forget about Briggs by the way? Obviously I am thinking we won't play a 3-4 and that's why we go after Briggs.

 

[Stitches]

I think you can forget about Briggs.

Are you saying that because he doesn't fit in a 3-4?

 

[fishypete]

Are you saying that because he doesn't fit in a 3-4?

I believe Briggs has or will be franchised.

 

[Stitches]

I believe Briggs has or will be franchised.

I thought they weren't going to use it again on him.

 

[fishypete]

I thought they weren't going to use it again on him.

The last I read was they were....we'll see.

 

[The Confessor]

I agree, if we didn't sign Briggs, and instead signed Randy Thomas for example I'd be looking for Conner or Mayo at 32.

Why could we forget about Briggs by the way? Obviously I am thinking we won't play a 3-4 and that's why we go after Briggs.

Actually, I love this scenario even better than signing Briggs. Connor or Mayo with that second and I am all over it bro.

I think Briggs will A: Be tendered and B: Know he is going to be expensive.


and now C: Looks like Zach wont be back....:up:

 

[Dfan06]

way too high for CLADY. Unless we trade down I am happy with it a 6'6 317 pound monster

 

[Stitches]

Actually, I love this scenario even better than signing Briggs. Connor or Mayo with that second and I am all over it bro.

I think Briggs will A: Be tendered and B: Know he is going to be expensive.


and now C: Looks like Zach wont be back....:up:

Well I did this before we knew Zach would be cut, and I would hope we address guard in FA. As I said Randy Thomas or Wahle would be great, though it looks like Wahle may end up in Seattle.

I figured I didn't have many reaches or people falling with where I picked them, with Clady being the closest thing to a reach.

 

[Stitches]

way too high for CLADY. Unless we trade down I am happy with it a 6'6 317 pound monster

I know it is considered a reach right now, I'm hoping he explodes at the combine is all. But I disagree with it being way too high, as Clady could go in top 5 for all we know.

 

[The Confessor]

I know it is considered a reach right now, I'm hoping he explodes at the combine is all. But I disagree with it being way too high, as Clady could go in top 5 for all we know.

Oh, I would say even prior to the combine, Clady could easily go top 5:up:

 

[Cutie]

And this would be your pick at the number 1 spot? -

Then our draft could potentially proceed as follows:
1. Ryan Clady, OT, Boise State

 

[The Confessor]

And this would be your pick at the number 1 spot? -

Then our draft could potentially proceed as follows:
1. Ryan Clady, OT, Boise State

Yes yes...you got it right so far...keep going........:up: