A winning QB on the bench

[Lawrence]

There were many times when he had time to throw.:roflmao::roflmao:

Boy thats funny. That why the OL keeps getting pounded by eveybody, because they give him too much time.

Last night there was a few times he had time. How are you going to say thats not true. I was there and saw it. Do you really think there were no plays where he had time? Not 1? And by the way, I'd take Chambers' assesment about the QB situation over yours, seeing as how hes on the team and all. And he wants Jay.

 

[DA DICK]

What has he shown that makes you think he can be "pretty good"

When he does get a half a second to throw the ball, he throws it so that the reciever can keep on running instead of being clobbered by a defender causing the ball to pop out. Kinda like Jay did in that Denver game where Chris Chambers almost had his head taken.

 

[Lawrence]

When he does get a half a second to throw the ball, he throws it so that the reciever can keep on running instead of being clobbered by a defender causing the ball to pop out. Kinda like Jay did in that Denver game where Chris Chambers almost had his head taken.

He overthrew Chamber a few times, and the picks whree not even rushed. What game did u watch?

 

[DA DICK]

Last night there was a few times he had time. How are you going to say thats not true. I was there and saw it. Do you really think there were no plays where he had time? Not 1? And by the way, I'd take Chambers' assesment about the QB situation over yours, seeing as how hes on the team and all. And he wants Jay.

Actually I couldnt see the game because they wouldnt show it where I live at. Thanks to Jeanne.

 

[Lawrence]

Actually I couldnt see the game because they wouldnt show it where I live at. Thanks to Jeanne.

You didn't even see it, and your trying to tell me about it. how the hell would you know if he played good or bad or anything? :roflmao: :roflmao: :roflmao: :roflmao: :roflmao: :roflmao: :roflmao: That's it, debate over. I'm going to go find someone who actually saw the game and may be qualified to speak on it.

 

[PhinBeck]

I guess because you support AJ you should run the team?? Just trying to understand what you're trying to say.

No what I am saying is everyone who didnt want AJ are coming out of the woodwrok after 2 games saying see Iwas right I was right I was right. I dont know if AJ will develop, but 2 games with and ENTIRELY new offense is way too early to judge. It may be time to do what Seattle did with Hasselback and go with the vet, and let AJ sit and learn while now he has some playing time and has some basis to go on. I just disagree with the all is lost with AJ he is a bust after 2 games, bad trade.

It is the all out need to prove they are right and their opinion was the valid opinion that is all consuming and all annoying. Yes I realize that my posts do the same to those posters but that is what I am going for, I want them to be annoyed, maybe then we can starts eeing each other opinion and talk football and not who is right.

I dont have the answers and dont proclaim to. What I want to know is why after giving Jay 4 years of Jay being inconsistent, making crucial mistakes in crunch time does AJ all of a sudden have to prove his worth in 2 games with an unstable o-line, a new rb and new wr?

 

[PerfectFinz72]

There were many times when he had time to throw.:roflmao::roflmao:

Boy thats funny. That why the OL keeps getting pounded by eveybody, because they give him too much time.

Actually, the TD he gave up against the Bengals he had time and made a TERRIBLE read. That's the only TD we gave up in that game. Even though they came back at the end, that game was more or less lost on that play,

 

[DA DICK]

You didn't even see it, and your trying to tell me about it. how the hell would you know if he played good or bad or anything? :roflmao: :roflmao: :roflmao: :roflmao: :roflmao: :roflmao: :roflmao: That's it, debate over. I'm going to go find someone who actually saw the game and may be qualified to speak on it.

I was referring about the previous two games. And we werent talking about a game in particular just players in general. But you just cant see that can you.:shakeno::shakeno:

 

[Lawrence]

I was referring about the previous two games. And we werent talking about a game in particular just players in general. But you just cant see that can you.:shakeno::shakeno:

Whatever you say. Hey go get a tape of the game and see how good AJ did. And then come back when you are qualified to talk. :roflmao:

 

[Lawrence]

I was referring about the previous two games. And we werent talking about a game in particular just players in general. But you just cant see that can you.:shakeno::shakeno:

ACtually if you read back, we were talking about last night's game, until you revealed that you dont watch football.

 

[DA DICK]

No what I am saying is everyone who didnt want AJ are coming out of the woodwrok after 2 games saying see Iwas right I was right I was right. I dont know if AJ will develop, but 2 games with and ENTIRELY new offense is way too early to judge. It may be time to do what Seattle did with Hasselback and go with the vet, and let AJ sit and learn while now he has some playing time and has some basis to go on. I just disagree with the all is lost with AJ he is a bust after 2 games, bad trade.

It is the all out need to prove they are right and their opinion was the valid opinion that is all consuming and all annoying. Yes I realize that my posts do the same to those posters but that is what I am going for, I want them to be annoyed, maybe then we can starts eeing each other opinion and talk football and not who is right.

I dont have the answers and dont proclaim to. What I want to know is why after giving Jay 4 years of Jay being inconsistent, making crucial mistakes in crunch time does AJ all of a sudden have to prove his worth in 2 games with an unstable o-line, a new rb and new wr?

Agreed, you cant give Fiedler 4 years with an offense that he knew yet give Feeley 2 and a half games with a brand new offense and make a judgement call to bench Feeley.

 

[DA DICK]

ACtually if you read back, we were talking about last night's game, until you revealed that you dont watch football.

Actually if you read back you can see that we were talking about AJ vs Jays previous 4 years performance. But you totally flew that over your little head. When at all did I refer to last nights game. Never. Unlike yourself I talk about what I know and not about what I dont know.

 

[PhinBeck]

You didn't even see it, and your trying to tell me about it. how the hell would you know if he played good or bad or anything? :roflmao: :roflmao: :roflmao: :roflmao: :roflmao: :roflmao: :roflmao: That's it, debate over. I'm going to go find someone who actually saw the game and may be qualified to speak on it.

Well I will tell you I saw it, every play. 2 ints, CC jogged on the deep one, you make excuses for CC and then say I make excusees for AJ, hello pot? Brent Jones bashed CC the whole game for it. The second one was a ball that slipped out of AJs hand, not an excuse, fact, you can see it. That is a MAJOR concern with AJ, it has happened more than can be accepted. When he had time, he made the passes to Booker, to Thompson over teh middle, to Randy. The seond int was hm scrambling away from teh pocket throwing on teh run. The fumble was being blindsided while throwing, aint AJs fault. How about the three other times he was blindsided, and he held onto teh ball, unlike Jay or Griese last year. You say 41 wins for Jay like Jay had sole credit for 41 wins. Tell me the games Jay picked teh team up when teh defense crumbled? I can show you triple where he failed.

I can also show you Brady picking up the pats when teh defense failed on several occasions, namely the super bowl and week1 this year.

Can AJ do that? not right now with this offense in its current state, but once it gels, I dont know, neither do you, that is what we have to find out.

 

[Rhoadsy13]

It's impossible to make you guys happy. When Wanstedt chose Fiedler as the starter, 80% of you were pissed off about the choice. Then he goes w/Feely and you guys are posting messages how happy you are. Now your crying to put Fiedler back. Thats what I HATE about our fans, there's no loyalty. I hate watching us lose as much as you guys, but Give me a break. Personally I wanted Fiedler to stay as are starter, but I wasn't crying when they went w/Feely. I am as big of a dolphin fan today as I was when they were winning.

 

[BleedinGreenNY]

No what I am saying is everyone who didnt want AJ are coming out of the woodwrok after 2 games saying see Iwas right I was right I was right. I dont know if AJ will develop, but 2 games with and ENTIRELY new offense is way too early to judge. It may be time to do what Seattle did with Hasselback and go with the vet, and let AJ sit and learn while now he has some playing time and has some basis to go on. I just disagree with the all is lost with AJ he is a bust after 2 games, bad trade.

It is the all out need to prove they are right and their opinion was the valid opinion that is all consuming and all annoying. Yes I realize that my posts do the same to those posters but that is what I am going for, I want them to be annoyed, maybe then we can starts eeing each other opinion and talk football and not who is right.

I dont have the answers and dont proclaim to. What I want to know is why after giving Jay 4 years of Jay being inconsistent, making crucial mistakes in crunch time does AJ all of a sudden have to prove his worth in 2 games with an unstable o-line, a new rb and new wr?

I could have sworn that i heard the same excuses last week.