Most of us knows that the AFC-East has been very tough for the last few years, but here us stats showing divisions winning % since 2002.
The AFC-East was the toughest division in 2003 and was the 3rd toughest in 2002...
2002-2003
1- AFC-East= 71-51 (55%), with NE and Mia leaders in winning %
2- NFC-South= 68-59-1 (53%), with Tam, and Car leaders in winning %
3- AFC-West= 67-61 (52%), with KC, Den and leaders in winning %
4- NFC-East= 65-63 (51%), Phily leading in winning %
5- AFC-South= 65-63 (51%), with Tenn, and Indi leaders in winning %
6- NFC-West= 62-66 (48%), with STL, SF, and Sea leaders in winning %
7- AFC-North= 57-70-1 (45%), with Balt leading in winning %
8- NFC-North= 56-72 (44%), with GB leading in winning %
Just some bit of tidbit for those that would seem interested. Kind of shows how some other division leaders have it easier than others, the easier the division, the easier to make it to the Post season...
The AFC-East was the toughest division in 2003 and was the 3rd toughest in 2002...
2002-2003
1- AFC-East= 71-51 (55%), with NE and Mia leaders in winning %
2- NFC-South= 68-59-1 (53%), with Tam, and Car leaders in winning %
3- AFC-West= 67-61 (52%), with KC, Den and leaders in winning %
4- NFC-East= 65-63 (51%), Phily leading in winning %
5- AFC-South= 65-63 (51%), with Tenn, and Indi leaders in winning %
6- NFC-West= 62-66 (48%), with STL, SF, and Sea leaders in winning %
7- AFC-North= 57-70-1 (45%), with Balt leading in winning %
8- NFC-North= 56-72 (44%), with GB leading in winning %
Just some bit of tidbit for those that would seem interested. Kind of shows how some other division leaders have it easier than others, the easier the division, the easier to make it to the Post season...