Alabama prospects Upshaw and Kirkpatrick don’t wow at Combine | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Alabama prospects Upshaw and Kirkpatrick don’t wow at Combine

J

jim1

Pro Bowler
Joined
Apr 17, 2006
Messages
5,826
Reaction score
307
We’ve talked a lot about the standouts at the just-completed NFL Scouting Combine, but what players may have hurt their stock?

According to Charley Casserly of NFL.com, highly rated Alabama defenders Courtney Upshaw and Dre Kirkpatrick are on the list.
Upshaw lacked the explosion that you’d like to see from an edge rusher according to Casserly. Kirkpatrick’s cornerback drills were lacking and he didn’t display the burst you’d like to see from a potential top-15 pick. It’s possible Janoris Jenkins could pass Kirkpatrick as the No. 2 cornerback in the draft.

UNC defensive end Quinton Couples is also mentioned as someone that struggled. While Coples ran a ridiculous forty time for his size, his work in the drills left something to be desired.

Of course, not everyone watching the workout is going to agree with Casserly. It only takes one team to fall in love, and Coples seems especially likely to make one team reach high for him in the draft.


http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.co...s-upshaw-and-kirkpatrick-dont-wow-at-combine/
 
Neither one helped themselves at the combine, although Kirkpatricks 4.4 time in the 40 helps. Kirkpatrick never made it to the #2 CB spot on my board at any point to begin with. He's just a little too stiff in his hips and doesn't have the elite man-to-man coverage skills. He's a good zone corner and a physical player.... good tackler who can hit. He'll stick his nose in there and pop ball carriers, force fumbles. Still a 1st round pick in the right system. He'll play a long time, perhaps even move to safety at some point.


I like Coples, but he just doesn't have the lower body explosion to be a consistent 10 sack guy. I've compared Malik Jackson and Coples several times and referred to Jackson as a bit of a poor man's Coples. They're essentially the same player, and play the game the same. They've both played a little bit of DT and DE in college, and they tested out very similar at the combine.


Coples: 6'5 3/4" -- 284 -- 33 1/4" arms -- 10 1/4" hands

Jackson: 6'4 3/4" -- 284 -- 33 3/4" arms -- 9" hands



Coples: 4.78 in the 40

Jackson: 4.91 in the 40


Coples: 25 reps

Jackson: 25 reps



Coples: 31.5" vertical

Jackson: 28" vertical


Coples: 9'1" broad

Jackson: 8'9" broad


Coples: 7.57 (3-cone)

Jackson: 7.38 (3-cone)


Coples: 4.78 (20 yard shuttle)

Jackson: 4.41 (20 yard shuttle)




I can see the advantage Jackson has over Coples in the 3-Cone and 20 yard shuttle on tape when they're both out play the DE position. Jackson can work a tackle over a little better on the edge when he's given the opportunity.



There's not much difference in their college production:


Coples: 50 games / 144 tackles / 40.5 TFL's / 24 sacks


Jackson: 39 games / 126 tackles / 27.5 TFL's / 13 sacks





The bottom line is, I don't think there's 3 rounds and several million dollars worth of difference between the two. Especially when you consider some of the inconsistency in effort with Coples. However, I don't believe that Coples issues are as much effort related as they are he just doesn't have the lower body explosion to stand out as much as people expect him to.
 
Whats really amazing about the Bama players is that not 1 single player wowwed any1.The Bama team as a whole did WOW every1.

It leaves a person to think,is 1 player that much Greater then the team itself?
 
TedSlimmJr said:
Neither one helped themselves at the combine, although Kirkpatricks 4.4 time in the 40 helps. Kirkpatrick never made it to the #2 CB spot on my board at any point to begin with. He's just a little too stiff in his hips and doesn't have the elite man-to-man coverage skills. He's a good zone corner and a physical player.... good tackler who can hit. He'll stick his nose in there and pop ball carriers, force fumbles. Still a 1st round pick in the right system. He'll play a long time, perhaps even move to safety at some point.


I like Coples, but he just doesn't have the lower body explosion to be a consistent 10 sack guy. I've compared Malik Jackson and Coples several times and referred to Jackson as a bit of a poor man's Coples. They're essentially the same player, and play the game the same. They've both played a little bit of DT and DE in college, and they tested out very similar at the combine.


Coples: 6'5 3/4" -- 284 -- 33 1/4" arms -- 10 1/4" hands

Jackson: 6'4 3/4" -- 284 -- 33 3/4" arms -- 9" hands



Coples: 4.78 in the 40

Jackson: 4.91 in the 40


Coples: 25 reps

Jackson: 25 reps



Coples: 31.5" vertical

Jackson: 28" vertical


Coples: 9'1" broad

Jackson: 8'9" broad


Coples: 7.57 (3-cone)

Jackson: 7.38 (3-cone)


Coples: 4.78 (20 yard shuttle)

Jackson: 4.41 (20 yard shuttle)




I can see the advantage Jackson has over Coples in the 3-Cone and 20 yard shuttle on tape when they're both out play the DE position. Jackson can work a tackle over a little better on the edge when he's given the opportunity.



There's not much difference in their college production:


Coples: 50 games / 144 tackles / 40.5 TFL's / 24 sacks


Jackson: 39 games / 126 tackles / 27.5 TFL's / 13 sacks





The bottom line is, I don't think there's 3 rounds and several million dollars worth of difference between the two. Especially when you consider some of the inconsistency in effort with Coples. However, I don't believe that Coples issues are as much effort related as they are he just doesn't have the lower body explosion to stand out as much as people expect him to.
Click to expand...

Works for me. I just can't help but think that Coples is a risk, and I'd personally take Upshaw or Ingram over him. I'm not all about comparing players from the same school, but if I recall correctly kentwan Balmer made a late run out of UNC a few years ago- I just can't wrap my head around the rationalizations of Coples' lack of production, and I don't really want to either.


Does Irealnd go for a 6-1 Upshaw or a 6-1 Ingram? I have my doubts. I'm firmly on record as which way I think we should go at #8, in the absence of a trade down. On top of everything else, Coples enjoying the south beach lifestyle seems like a potential problem as well. For better or worse, my instinct is to shy away from that guy.
 
NFL Combine 2012: Courtney Upshaw's Workout Reveals Major Flaw in His Game

No doubt Upshaw will be a terrific run defender, as long as he stays disciplined. If he gets out of position in the NFL, his athletic limitations won't allow him to recover, and running backs will be able to zip right past him.

Is Courtney Upshaw an outside linebacker in the NFL?
Yes
55.6%
No
44.4%
Total votes: 63
Click to expand...

What this shows me is that Upshaw will likely be better suited as a defensive lineman than as a linebacker. He isn't a three-down player as a linebacker due to his inability to turn and cover. Linebackers who can't play three downs should never be taken in the first round.
When compared to the other top defensive linemen coming out, I would have to say that Upshaw ranks lower than Melvin Ingram, Quinton Coples, Whitney Mercilus and Nick Perry.
Before the combine, I had considered Upshaw to be a top-10 pick in the 2012 NFL draft. After his workout on the field, I don't see him being taken inside the top 20.
Upshaw can improve his stock with a strong showing at his March 7 pro day. Until he proves otherwise, however, I don't see him as a viable option to play outside linebacker in the NFL.
Click to expand...
Read entire article:http://bleacherreport.com/articles/...pshaws-workout-reveals-major-flaw-in-his-game
 
Last edited by a moderator:
DKphin said:
NFL Combine 2012: Courtney Upshaw's Workout Reveals Major Flaw in His Game

Read entire article:http://bleacherreport.com/articles/...pshaws-workout-reveals-major-flaw-in-his-game
Click to expand...



The thing I disagree with here is that Upshaw is better suited as a defensive lineman than a linebacker (3-4 rush linebacker). You can't line up Courtney Upshaw or Melvin Ingram at DE in the NFL for 70+ snaps, down after down, and expect them to beat NFL offensive tackles with 34-35" arms. They're going to get blocked and stay blocked a lot. Their arms are too short, and they don't have the initial first step quickness to beat tackles down after down. In fact, there's not many in the NFL that do. Very few.

You have to move players around and put them in the best position to be productive for you. Even proven pro-bowl pass rushers in the NFL need this.


You can't just draft 6'1" guys with 31" arms and think you're going to line them up and play them at DE every snap and they're just going to rack up sacks for you. It requires a plan. Upshaw and Ingram are the type of guys that can be productive for you, and be impact players in the edge of your defense..... but it's going to take a coach who's creative and has a plan for how to use them.

Upshaw understands the aspect of maintaining leverage, and the responsibilities of force and contain because he was coached so well on how to do it.

They're both talented and versatile players. You have to use them in creative ways like they were used in college by coaches like Ellis Johnson, Kirby Smart, and Nick Saban.


Nick Perry on the other hand, I think that's the type of kid you can just line up for 70 snaps over a left tackle and just let him eat. He has just enough length and the dynamic, explosive lower body to handle it. You'll still need to stunt and blitz, move him around a little bit, etc. to keep things fresh.
 
TedSlimmJr said:
Nick Perry on the other hand, I think that's the type of kid you can just line up for 70 snaps over a left tackle and just let him eat. He has just enough length and the dynamic, explosive lower body to handle it. You'll still need to stunt and blitz, move him around a little bit, etc. to keep things fresh.
Click to expand...
I am with you on Perry. I heard that Upshaw did not have as short as arms as Ingram. He measured in at around 33", although I can not find anything in print.
 
DKphin said:
I am with you on Perry. I heard that Upshaw did not have as short as arms as Ingram. He measured in at around 33", although I can not find anything in print.
Click to expand...


Upshaw 32" arms, 1/2" longer than Ingram's.
 
Is Upshaw the same size and weight as C.Wake? With Wake staring at 30yrs old, taking Upshaw in the 3rd might be a quality move.
 
NorFlaFin said:
Is Upshaw the same size and weight as C.Wake? With Wake staring at 30yrs old, taking Upshaw in the 3rd might be a quality move.
Click to expand...

Id agree with you but we may miss out on Luck. Maybe we could trade back into the 3rd to snag both?
 
The lack of agility seen in Coples' 3-cone and shuttle showed up in his films (at least to me). He was quick off the snap but lacked the great lateral agility to turn the corner or adjust on run plays inside tackles that we've seen in elite rushers before like Julius Peppers. Add to that his motor questions and i'm not jumping through the roof to draft him at this point. Can he be solid? Sure. Elite? I'm not seeing that like others are.

Upshaw i view somewhat similar. His hands are violent and his body is thick, so he holds up well against the run and has pretty good feet. He also plays with nice leverage and has a nice shoulder dip to turn the corner. But he does not have a great first step or an explosive rush, so i wonder what type of sack potential he offers. He doesn't seem to be extremely fluid to be playing in space at OLB in a 3-4 (mainly a rush OLB), so i question what his true value is? Top 10? I don't know.

Because i'm not sold on either one of those guys to be elite rushers, which would warrant a Top-10 pick and fill a need at pass rusher for Miami, i would be willing to take a chance on a freak at a highly paid need position like Dontari Poe (boom or bust type player), a freak at a skill position like Trent Richardson, the top guard to come along in many years in DeCastro, or a non-sexy pick at a huge need position like RT (i like Jonathan Martin more than Reiff). I wouldn't even be opposed to taking Kuechly if we decide to switch to a 4-3 and move Dansby outside. Or you can be like Belichick and trade down, add much needed picks and get better value.....maybe look at guys like Mark Barron, Michael Floyd, Tannehill, Mike Adams, Poe, etc.
 
Upshaw, Couples and KirkPatrick are not elite top 10 talent IMHO.
Couples seems lazy.
I would pass on all of them at #8
 
PSU Cane said:
The lack of agility seen in Coples' 3-cone and shuttle showed up in his films (at least to me). He was quick off the snap but lacked the great lateral agility to turn the corner or adjust on run plays inside tackles that we've seen in elite rushers before like Julius Peppers. Add to that his motor questions and i'm not jumping through the roof to draft him at this point. Can he be solid? Sure. Elite? I'm not seeing that like others are.

Upshaw i view somewhat similar. His hands are violent and his body is thick, so he holds up well against the run and has pretty good feet. He also plays with nice leverage and has a nice shoulder dip to turn the corner. But he does not have a great first step or an explosive rush, so i wonder what type of sack potential he offers. He doesn't seem to be extremely fluid to be playing in space at OLB in a 3-4 (mainly a rush OLB), so i question what his true value is? Top 10? I don't know.

Because i'm not sold on either one of those guys to be elite rushers, which would warrant a Top-10 pick and fill a need at pass rusher for Miami, i would be willing to take a chance on a freak at a highly paid need position like Dontari Poe (boom or bust type player), a freak at a skill position like Trent Richardson, the top guard to come along in many years in DeCastro, or a non-sexy pick at a huge need position like RT (i like Jonathan Martin more than Reiff). I wouldn't even be opposed to taking Kuechly if we decide to switch to a 4-3 and move Dansby outside. Or you can be like Belichick and trade down, add much needed picks and get better value.....maybe look at guys like Mark Barron, Michael Floyd, Tannehill, Mike Adams, Poe, etc.
Click to expand...

I agree 100% with your post.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom