hoops
Tua time!
if i can get a 2nd rounder for ronnie brown i'm trading him...guy just can't stay healthy and he's getting close to that dreaded 30 age
if i can get a 2nd rounder for ronnie brown i'm trading him...guy just can't stay healthy and he's getting close to that dreaded 30 age
How can we be heading to a more explosive offense without the explosive type players at WR? Boldin, Hartline, Bess and Turner are all possession types with very little, if any, explosiveness in their game. Maybe adding someone like Ohio's Taylor Price or UConn's Marcus Easley could add to that explosive offense we are heading to.
Why not? They've traded with us before as well as with other teams within the division. If the deal is right for them, NE will trade with anyone.
Of course I saw the part with Spiller and Scheffler, I agreed with adding those two. I don't care how beastly Boldin is, he is not going to make the receiving corp anything close to explosive. He is just another possession receiver and we have plenty of those already on the team. The difference is that Boldin racks up a lot of yards after the catch.Did you see the part of the thread that said we select Spiller a player that can score at any touch, Scheffler an actual receiving threat that can stretch the defense, Boldin who is a beast of a WR. Not every player on your team needs to be explosive to have an explosive offense. We still need to convert 3rd downs and there's nothing wrong with getting 10-15 yard plays out of Hartline.
If that's not explosive enough for you then I'm guessing no matter what we do it won't be good enough.
I wasn't necessarily talking about the Welker trade because the commisioner actually made that one happen. I was talking in general. Just as the Patriots traded Bledsoe to the Bills because it benefitted both teams, there is nothing that would prevent them from doing the same with Wilfork, if the right deal comes along.They traded with us because they took us to the cleaners on that trade and I'm sure they would love to do that again, who wouldn't?
They gave us a pick, we gave them a player to haunt us twice a year for the rest of his career. Their not going to do the same for us, they'd probably give him away for less then help us out which would end up hurting them in the long run.
I wasn't necessarily talking about the Welker trade because the commisioner actually made that one happen. I was talking in general. Just as the Patriots traded Bledsoe to the Bills because it benefitted both teams, there is nothing that would prevent them from doing the same with Wilfork, if the right deal comes along.
Of course I saw the part with Spiller and Scheffler, I agreed with adding those two. I don't care how beastly Boldin is, he is not going to make the receiving corp anything close to explosive. He is just another possession receiver and we have plenty of those already on the team. The difference is that Boldin racks up a lot of yards after the catch.
To be an explosive offense, you need players who are going to get you some chunk yardage and Boldin won't do much to add to the seven the Dolphins had as a team last season.
As great as Boldin is, he had only one reception that traveled more than 20 yards in the air.
i dont like the idea of really any of that bro... sorry but ronnie when healthy alone is worth a first hes one of the top running backs in the league.
and i know pretty much everyone on this thing hates ginn but hes a playmaker could imagine him with someone like B. Marshall on the otherside?
porter alone should bring us a fourth alone but i do like the idea of bringing in scheffler.
cj spiller is a stud ill give you that but not what we need 2 become a superbowl contender
The only players I would trade for are Marshall and Sheffler (Porter, Ginn, 2nd, and lower round pick)
If Wilfork or Hampton become FAs sign one of them (draft a NT if neither are available)
Sign Dansby
Draft ILB, OLB, WR/RB (return guy), LG, and RB (Ricky's replacement)
(BPA in the appropriate rounds)