An ugly picture... | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

An ugly picture...

EightyTwenty

Practice Squad
Joined
Sep 12, 2004
Messages
741
Reaction score
0
Here ya go boys- some analysis from the SportingNews War room:

"Miami’s defense is in pieces. Tackle Tim Bowens and cornerbacks Patrick Surtain (groin) and Reggie Howard (hamstring) missed last Sunday’s game vs. Cincinnati, and end Jason Taylor suffered a foot injury during the game. Bowens is trying to return this week, but tackle Larry Chester is done for the season after tearing his right ACL. Can Miami’s defense hold things together while the offense tries to gain a measure of competency? Right now, it doesn’t matter who’s behind center  the QB faces more pressure than a senior during exam week. In addition to a wretched passing game, the team’s running backs can’t even get to the line of scrimmage without getting pancaked."

On McMichael:

"McMichael is coming off a six-catch, 93-yard game vs. the Bengals. Miami’s offensive line is wimpier than “John Mayer’s Greatest Hits,†and McMichael will remain the Fins’ top passing option until things change dramatically. This week, Mac will use his size, power and speed to post another strong game vs. Pittsburgh’s average linebackers and secondary, especially off play-action."

More:

"Miami is averaging 45 rushing yards a game  easily the worst rushing offense in the league. The passing game appears OK superficially, but Miami’s quarterbacks have thrown an AFC-worst five interceptions  including two that were returned for TDs. Pittsburgh’s line is good enough to quell the run immediately and apply pressure to A.J. Feely. The Pittsburgh secondary is somewhat weak, but will Feeley have enough time to get off a pass? The Steelers will blitz creatively to apply pressure from all over the field. There is no way Miami will be able to mount an effective offense under these conditions"

Even more:

"Miami’s offensive line was exposed vs. the Bengals last week. Miami has four new starters, and the unit hasn’t proved it can effectively run block or pass block. Feeley started last week and showed some positive signs, but for the most part, he was battered like a catfish filet. Cincinnati’s defensive line isn’t particularly talented, so what will happen vs. a more talented Pittsburgh defense? Feeley is expected to start this week. He has the talent to make the passing game work in Miami, but that won’t happen until his line improves dramatically. Fiedler? Fiedler is an even worse option."

And finally some stuff on Gordon:

"Gordon isn’t as awful as his stat line suggests. Miami’s offensive line is probably the worst in the NFL at run blocking, and it has created no holes for Gordon to exploit. Gordon might be a three-star back in the right situation, but this isn’t it. The Steelers’ defense will stuff LG like a martini olive."

How bout them apples....
 
Sad, but true.

Honestly, I didn't think there was any way our offensive line could be any worse than last year's version.

I was wrong...
 
Rebar71 said:
Sad, but true.

Honestly, I didn't think there was any way our offensive line could be any worse than last year's version.

I was wrong...
But the question I keep asking myself, will they be better in the future because of the growing pains they suffered this year?
 
Question is...

If you're the coach, what kind of plays do you draw up to overcome this O-line problem? Seems to me New England has not had particularly stellar run-blocking going on during their recent super-bowl years, and they seemed to overcome it with the quick, short passing game. Then again- they have Brady, who is an extremely accurate Quarterback.
 
EightyTwenty said:
If you're the coach, what kind of plays do you draw up to overcome this O-line problem? Seems to me New England has not had particularly stellar run-blocking going on during their recent super-bowl years, and they seemed to overcome it with the quick, short passing game. Then again- they have Brady, who is an extremely accurate Quarterback.
They have more than just the short passing game. They have a coach that can adapt versus diferent opponents. If they can't run block or percieve to do so, they open in the shotgun with 5 wides and dink and dunk their opponent to death(opening drive versus the Colts).

That no hudle, 5 wide, opening series against the colts was amazing. They took what the colts do and put it right back in their face. That's adaptive coaching. We will not see that here so much.

So, it doesn't really matter what we would draw up as a coach as what Wannstedt WILL do as the coach.
 
EightyTwenty said:
If you're the coach, what kind of plays do you draw up to overcome this O-line problem? Seems to me New England has not had particularly stellar run-blocking going on during their recent super-bowl years, and they seemed to overcome it with the quick, short passing game. Then again- they have Brady, who is an extremely accurate Quarterback.
Been saying all week at work that we need Feeleyin the shotgun and do short timing routes to McMike Chambers and BOoker, then when the defense comes in hit Chambers on a long route. also, lots more passing to Gordon, no more running until line improves.
 
EightyTwenty said:
 the QB faces more pressure than a senior during exam week.

... the team’s running backs can’t even get to the line of scrimmage without getting pancaked."

Miami’s offensive line is wimpier than “John Mayer’s Greatest Hits,â€Â

.....Feeley started last week and showed some positive signs, but for the most part, he was battered like a catfish filet.

The Steelers’ defense will stuff LG like a martini olive."

These guy's spend half their time thinking up similes.
 
BlitPhinFan said:
They have more than just the short passing game. They have a coach that can adapt versus diferent opponents. If they can't run block or percieve to do so, they open in the shotgun with 5 wides and dink and dunk their opponent to death(opening drive versus the Colts).

That no hudle, 5 wide, opening series against the colts was amazing. They took what the colts do and put it right back in their face. That's adaptive coaching. We will not see that here so much.

So, it doesn't really matter what we would draw up as a coach as what Wannstedt WILL do as the coach.
Totally agree. Teams that win in todays NFL, have coaches that know how to innovate, and attack the weaknesses of the team they're playing that particular week. Wannstedt just "doesn't believe in that". Weird. He keeps lining up the players in the same way, week after week...trying to force the same 5 or 6 running plays, and running a plain-vanilla passing attack. It's just not going to work, and it amazes me he doesn't see it. Perhaps he's stuck in an early 90's Dallas Cowboys time-warp...
 
FinaciousOne said:
These guy's spend half their time thinking up similes.
Pancaked is an NFL term, but otherwise, yeah, they do. However, they use them very effectively and the point they are trying to make is made easier to understand. Whimpier than John Mayer's Greatest Hits? Genius. :lol:
 
The article is fairly accurate about the offense. The defense, however is still one of the leagues best even with the injuries. That's not a concern. About 30 other teams in the league would trade defenses with us.

I've been thinking about the offense and I really have to blame Wanny for being indecisive throughout the offseason about key positions. He should have put Feely in and given him the most work. His lack of time with the first team is showing. The o-line? I have a few questions for Tony Wise. No way in hell these guys should be this bad. Have the starting 5 not been introduced to each other? Like you guys, I have watched a lot of Dolphin football over the years and can not recall anything like this.
 
Fin Fan in Cali said:
But the question I keep asking myself, will they be better in the future because of the growing pains they suffered this year?
With experience should come improvement - but isn't that what we thought about Wade Smith? And hasn't he been about the worst guy out of this sorry lot? I mean - c'mon - didn't we just make the freakin' Bengals D-line look like it was stacked with a bunch of pro-bowlers.

The good news is... there's nowhere to go but up! :goof:
 
Two running backs severely injured in the first game of the season and Lamar Gordon has a banged up back. Yeah I'd say that is an indication of lack of run blocking.
 
EightyTwenty said:
If you're the coach, what kind of plays do you draw up to overcome this O-line problem? Seems to me New England has not had particularly stellar run-blocking going on during their recent super-bowl years, and they seemed to overcome it with the quick, short passing game. Then again- they have Brady, who is an extremely accurate Quarterback.

I would hope to see some 3 WR, 1 TE, 1 RB shotgun sets. At least AJ can see who is coming free, plus you can run delayed hand off draws if the ends start getting upfield to often. Imagine Booker and DT spread out to the right with Randy on the line off RT. This will overload the right side and leave Chambers in one on one for short routes, which will open up the deep routes later. You can dink and dunk them to death, their secondary is weak and 3 WR will spread them more thin and open up holes for the backs on screens and Randy underneath. I really think we will look better this week, Dave now knows that he is going to have to adjust..... his style WILL NOT WORK!!!! But a screen pass is just as effective as a run.



Side Note....600 posts :D
 
Back
Top Bottom