And I thought our D-line was scary... | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

And I thought our D-line was scary...

The Tannehills Have Eyes

The Tannehills Have Eyes

Active Roster
Joined
Oct 10, 2011
Messages
4,760
Reaction score
960
Location
Miami
Bills D-Line

Dareus - 34 tackles, 10 sacks
M. Williams- 23 tackles, 7 sacks
Jerry Hughes - 32 tackles 7.5 sacks
K. Williams - 25 tackles, 2.5 sacks
 
Yup, gonna be a fun day to say the least. All I can say is that we need to play horizontally with quick passes. We should have done that more with Detroit. That and the last time we played Buffalo, Tannehill wasn't being used with the read option. I'm not sure if that will be a factor or not but still it is something they will have to account for.
 
i'm thinking the adjustment will be unbalanced sets with an extra olineman on the field...theres just not enough practice time to do much else...it may work for a half but the bills will adjust...whatever trick plays are in the chamber this is the week to unload them...just try and win ugly cause this suckers gonna be anything but pretty

if we were going there under this scenario the game would be a blood bath...at least its at home
 
2 TE Sets. Not used enough and RT's stats are better under 12 Personnel.
 
As a team, we have 31 sacks, 32 hits, and 121 hurries. Buff has 39 sacks, 34 hits, and 95 hurries.

Looks very similar to the Lion's comparison, and neither team disappointed in bringing a lot of pressure.
 
I agree on unbalanced lines and having Garner come on as an extra O-lineman...btw.
 
hooshoops said:
i'm thinking the adjustment will be unbalanced sets with an extra olineman on the field...theres just not enough practice time to do much else...it may work for a half but the bills will adjust...whatever trick plays are in the chamber this is the week to unload them...just try and win ugly cause this suckers gonna be anything but pretty

if we were going there under this scenario the game would be a blood bath...at least its at home
Click to expand...

Who are you thinking of bringing in for the 6th OL? If Sims is healthy, would we not be better with him?
 
In our first game, Buff had 4 sacks, 4 hits, and 10 hurries, and that was with Albert.

In a very disappointing performance, we only had 0 sacks, 3 hits, and 4 hurries. That ain't gonna work for Thursday.
 
Southbeach 2 said:
Who are you thinking of bringing in for the 6th OL? If Sims is healthy, would we not be better with him?
Click to expand...

sims never even limited practiced last week...i seriously doubt in a short week he plays and if he did he'd be limited...2 tight end sets without him wont help you much vs that d...i imagine garner would be the obvious extra olineman of the depth if he doesnt start at right tackle...have to be someone they think can play in space...
 
We need to start fast and score first. If we fall behind by a touchdown or more, it could get ugly.
 
hooshoops said:
sims never even limited practiced last week...i seriously doubt in a short week he plays and if he did he'd be limited...2 tight end sets without him wont help you much vs that d...i imagine garner would be the obvious extra olineman of the depth if he doesnt start at right tackle...have to be someone they think can play in space...
Click to expand...

Don't see Garner as that guy. Maybe Turner can surprise to play the 6th OL. It would be a way to break him in without much pressure of expectations. I kinda like that idea.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom