Another Dolphins Preview (Most positive I've seen)
- Thread starter DuderinoN703
- Start date
Wannstache
Practice Squad
we need to catch some effing interceptions
zach attach
Active Roster
Yes, CATCH. Forced fumbles, strips, whatever. We need game changing plays, and we will need them in the first game of the season.
If the review was negative, the homers would be up in arms about how all the ESPN writers are Pats homers and hate on us for no reason and that the writer is a no-name that no one has ever heard of. But since it's a positive, he must clearly know what he's talking about 
3 keys will determine if we improve significantly or continue mediocrity, imo:
1. Can the defense FINALLY convert those turnovers that they've dropped as of late?
2. Will Henne continue to improve, limit the mistakes, and be more consistent as he's shown recently?
3. Does ANYONE on the right side of the OL want to show up and open us some lanes?
Any improvement in these three areas would be welcome. This team can be a force if we do get any help in one or all three of these areas. Execution, execution, execution. Gotta have it now.
1. Can the defense FINALLY convert those turnovers that they've dropped as of late?
2. Will Henne continue to improve, limit the mistakes, and be more consistent as he's shown recently?
3. Does ANYONE on the right side of the OL want to show up and open us some lanes?
Any improvement in these three areas would be welcome. This team can be a force if we do get any help in one or all three of these areas. Execution, execution, execution. Gotta have it now.
Tunaphish429
1st Ballot Hall of Famer
The only way we are going to win this year is if we score more points than the other team and/or they score less..
Simple enough.
Simple enough.
finfan54
Active Roster
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2002
- Messages
- 26,168
- Reaction score
- 29
or as my wife always chimes in right before gametime..."just dont turn the ball over!"
madmic21
Active Roster
For all you madden haters. I beat the cowboys in an online match last night 35-0. Four Picks!!! Misi, Bell (2), Clemons.
72champagne
the annual ritual
if that's your forum psychology thesis... forget about it, no-name hater.If the review was negative, the homers would be up in arms about how all the ESPN writers are Pats homers and hate on us for no reason and that the writer is a no-name that no one has ever heard of. But since it's a positive, he must clearly know what he's talking about
Forget about it? Do you mean fuhgget about it? What are you, a wannabe gangster?
[video=youtube;Zf0ZyoUn7Vk]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zf0ZyoUn7Vk[/video]
FUHGET ABOUT IT
madmic21
Active Roster
If the review was negative, the homers would be up in arms about how all the ESPN writers are Pats homers and hate on us for no reason and that the writer is a no-name that no one has ever heard of. But since it's a positive, he must clearly know what he's talking about
IMO it has more to do with agreeing and disagreeing. I am no genius when it comes to the NFL but when I read an article that places this team at 3-13 I disagree. I follow this team more closely than most of these paid writers who have a collective overview of the league with little focus on the individual team. Most are bogged down by the current trend and simplify their arguement by bunching what the main stream idea is. The leagues obvious picks all go 12-4 and the teams behind them go 4-12. I however, cannot believe that you can logically take a team that went 7-9 last year and made the changes we made (speed, OC, improvements on D ect) and say they are 3-4 games worse. Especially when two teams ahead of them made questionable to non-factor roster moves in the offseason. If you want to bust out this team is going to implode idea I can't buy that either. These guys like all teams are PROFESSIONAL COMPETITORS. If you wanna use last years Pats game against me go ahead but I will attribute that to more than just quitting. It is far more complex. Take away Henning and this team as far less reasons to not be in that spot this year. I would say that 99% of these players are 100% behind that staff and that 1% will soon be cut or spend little time on the field this year.
If the review was negative, the homers would be up in arms about how all the ESPN writers are Pats homers and hate on us for no reason and that the writer is a no-name that no one has ever heard of. But since it's a positive, he must clearly know what he's talking about
Sure. But at least Williamson's points are backed up with valid information rather than the typical 'thrown-together' opinions you'll get from Herm Edwards and the Mike and Mike dweebs. Fair criticism is welcome too, I'm all for reality.
madmic21
Active Roster
Maybe they were just saving up those plays from last year for this year. Seeing that a turnover would just be a 3 and out wildcat disaster they just said **** it we will use them next year. I kid.