antonio bryant | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

antonio bryant

mbsinmisc

mbsinmisc

Pro Bowler
Joined
Dec 30, 2003
Messages
1,126
Reaction score
7
Age
61
Location
Murrells Inlet, S.C.
Just read an interview on everyone favorite...PFT, I guess Antonio Bryant would love to play for the Phins.

I know he had trouble in Dallas, but I have thought he was a solid receiver. The question would be, who goes? Welker? Booker?

Is he enough of an upgrade to get rid of one of those two?

It appears he has matured, of course he could be full of @@@@.

Here is a link.

http://www.profootballtalk.com/AntonioBryant.htm
 
If one has to go, Booker's 3.1 million instead of Welker's $385,000. Would be an interesting signing, but would prefer Givens or Randle El. Less baggage for maybe a little more money.
 
He doesn't seem like a bad option after reading the article. I would not mind signing him. He seems like a young WR on the verge of having top 10 WR numbers.
 
sure i'd like him but waht article btw?
 
I dont like him. Bryant is no good. Id rather Randle El if we could, but I doubt we could get why
 
playmaker1 said:
I dont like him. Bryant is no good. Id rather Randle El if we could, but I doubt we could get why
Click to expand...

Oh he is no good and you dont like him. But for a second receiver for the Cleveland Browns last year Bryant only had 69 catches for 1006 yards. He could be a great second receiver to Chambers in Miami and with him Chambers and Booker then that would be an awesome threesome. He had more yards and catches than Randel El and Givens with, I think we can say, way less talent at quarterback.
 
I just read the article. I think Bryant would be a good addition. Especially since he has a passion for the fins. He would also prolly be cheaper than booker. Or even if we bring him in for depth. Welker is a good slot receiver, but he cant fill in for injuries on the outside.
 
Not bad of an option at all. I actually like the guy and if we can replace him with Booker (because he will be less $), then it will be a good move IMO.
 
i think he would be a great addition as well 4 a little less $$$$,he's reaaly good after the catch and can stretch the defense,he has better speed thats for sure. he keeps getting better every year plus with chambers on the otherside could be dangerous.Actually i'm hoping booker decides to help the dolphins out by restructuring or pay cut like thomas and taylor.
 
islanddolphin said:
Oh he is no good and you dont like him. But for a second receiver for the Cleveland Browns last year Bryant only had 69 catches for 1006 yards. He could be a great second receiver to Chambers in Miami and with him Chambers and Booker then that would be an awesome threesome. He had more yards and catches than Randel El and Givens with, I think we can say, way less talent at quarterback.
Click to expand...

This is true, Id rather not spend the money on him and draft a WR late and work on him, there is alot of talent that would help. I think Bryant will cost too much for a third WR. Alot bigger needs on our team right now
 
playmaker1 said:
This is true, Id rather not spend the money on him and draft a WR late and work on him, there is alot of talent that would help. I think Bryant will cost too much for a third WR. Alot bigger needs on our team right now
Click to expand...

Bryant would be a great addition to the Phins at a need position. We need another 2/3 WR and Welker is definately not that player. Bryant has a lot of talent and would be very welcome IMO. I think you are getting way too concerned about QB and the OL, they seem to be the ones targetted by the Media. IMO we shood be concentrating on in free agency another WR and LB, the rest can be drafted. CC,Booker and Bryant would be a great group of starting WRs.
 
I think Bryant would be a great fit in Miami. He has the skills to be great, and has shown some flashes of that last year with the Browns. If one had to go, I would say Booker because of his salary, but would want to keep him if possible. I love Welker, but would rather have a starting 3 of Chambers/Bryant/Booker. Of course, there's other FA WR available, so if we can't get someone like Givens, then I would go for Bryant before Randel El. I think Randel El will want to much money, more than what he's worth.
 
I would love to have him. I was discussing this with my brother when we were at the Cleveland Massacre.
 
playmaker1 said:
This is true, Id rather not spend the money on him and draft a WR late and work on him, there is alot of talent that would help. I think Bryant will cost too much for a third WR. Alot bigger needs on our team right now
Click to expand...
He's better than a 3 right now. He would be an upgrade over Booker, IMO, simply because he is better at stretching the field.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom